Another effort:
So evaṁ
They thus
Adinnādānaṁ pahāya adinnādānā paṭivirato
Taking having-abandoned from-taking refrains
So santuṭṭho hoti piṇḍapātena
They content is (with the) food-they-are-given
So iminā samannāgato ajjhattaṁ ANAVAJJASUKHAṀ paṭisaṁvedeti
They with-this endowed inwardly blameless-comfort experiences
So cakkhunā rūpaṁ disvā na nimittaggāhī hoti na anubyañjanaggāhī
They with-eye form having-seen not feature-grasper is not detail-grasper
tassa saṁvarāya paṭipajjati rakkhati cakkhundriyaṁ cakkhundriye saṁvaraṁ āpajjati for-that for-restraint undertakes protects eye-faculty in-eye-faculty restraint acquires
So abhikkante paṭikkante sampajānakārī hoti
They going returning fully-aware is
So VIVITTAṀ senāsanaṁ bhajati araññaṁ rukkhamūlaṁ pabbataṁ
They secluded dwelling resorts forest tree-root mountain
So nisīdati pallaṅkaṁ
They sit cross-legged
So abhijjhaṁ loke pahāya vigatābhijjhena cetasā viharati
They desires in-world having-abandoned free-from-desires with-mind dwells
ABHIJJHĀYA CITTAṀ PARISODHETI
(of) desires (the) mind purifies
ADUKKHAMASUKHAṀ UPEKKHĀSATIPĀRISUDDHIṀ upasampajja viharati
neither-pain-nor-pleasure equanimity-mindfulness-purity attaining dwells
So evaṁ samāhite citte parisuddhe pariyodāte
They thus concentrated mind purified completely-pure
āneñjappatte āsavānaṁ khayañāṇāya cittaṁ abhininnāmeti
unshakable-attainment of-influences for-destruction-knowledge mind inclines
“ime āsavā”ti YATHĀBHŪTAṀ PAJĀNĀTI
“these are-influences” as-they-really-are knows
“ayaṁ ĀSAVANIRODHAGĀMINĪ PAṬIPADĀ”ti yathābhūtaṁ pajānāti
“this is-path-leading-to cessation-of-influences” as-it-really-is knows
Tassa evaṁ jānato evaṁ passato kāmāsavāpi cittaṁ VIMUCCATI
For-them, thus knowing, thus seeing, from-sensual-influences mind is-liberated
So to summarise, the essential “moral action” is the act of leaving the life of fighting for your supper to leading a life of accepting charity.
This is universal amongst ALL the Ajivika, Jain and Buddhist renunciants. This is what they have in common. this is fundamental. A person who has renounced has renounced the acts that bring about sustenance of the body. they are reliant on the offerings of devout and faithful persons to live.
Receiving these gifts (of portions of food) they are GRATEFUL, they would starve to death otherwise.
When you recieve a gift you feel nice. you feel grateful. you feel happy.
When you don’t eat you starve.
So the gift of food is literally saving your life.
When someone saves your life, you feel grateful, you feel happy. you feel joy. you feel good.
That is the point. that is the fundamental act of the renunciant.
pretty much all the rest has always seemed to me to be a never ending series of additional information required by people who want to somehow squirm out of the central idea.
Like, “OK, I can only eat what is freely given but can I talk women into having sex with me?”
“Here we go again, OK community, add another line to the list, no having sex with people.”
The fundamental idea, explored quite thoroughly in MN94 and MN101 is that Buddhism, in contract to the Jains, uses PLEASURE or COMFORT or EASE as the basis from which to achieve liberation from the influences of the sensual realm.
An enormous amount of the fundementals of the teaching is obscured rather than clarified by the process, evident in the development of the corpus on close examination, of the dialectical philosophy of A notA Both Neither.
the earliest strata of the texts do not bother with it. they are happy with “relying on nothing” because there is not yet the sophisticated dialectic that occurs as the literature develops.
Similar neither-pleasure-nor-pain as an “advance” on “pleasure” is really just a dialectical evolution. It is unnecessary. the fundamental is simply living a pure life, purifying the mind, and realizing freedom from sensual influence.
one free from sensual influence is perfected.
all the rest is just elaboration.