Abandoning by Factor-Substitution

I came across this passage in The Discourse on the Root of Existence, translated and explained by Bhikkhu Bodhi.

“Thus personality view is abandoned by the defining of mentality-materiality, the views of acausality and wrong causal relationships by the discernment of conditions, uncertainty in regard to this by the subsequent transcending of doubts, the assumption of ‘I’ and ‘mine’ by the insight-comprehension of groups… This is called ‘abandoning by factor-substitution.’”

It feels like a whole path of practice is being outlined here. not just what to let go of, but how, and by what means. Each defilement is countered not by force, but by insight or knowledge.

I wonder how others understand “abandoning by factor-substitution.” Have you come across similar lists or teachings in other suttas? How do you relate to this approach in your own practice?

Grateful for any reflections, corrections, or pointers to related texts.

[Source: The Discourse on the Root of Existence, Bhikkhu Bodhi – ‎The Discourse on the Root of Existence by Bhikkhu Bodhi on Apple Books]

2 Likes

It’s a great discussion topic.

As I see it, substitution with opposites falls under the training of right effort, specifically overcoming unwholesome states and generating wholesome ones.

Here are a few suttas where this comes up:

Extinguish unwholesome qualities by cultivating their wholesome counterparts. (MN 8)

Abandon what’s unwholesome and devote yourself to wholesome states (analogy: cleaning up sāla-tree grove). (MN 21, I 124)

With the support of [wholesome action/state], [unwholesome counterpart] is to be abandoned. (MN 54, I 360)

Rely on happiness, sadness, and equanimity connected with renunciation to abandon happiness, sadness, and equanimity connected with the household life. Rely on happiness connected with renunciation to abandon sadness connected with renunciation. Rely on the equanimity connected with renunciation to abandon the joy connected with renunciation. (MN 137, III 220)

Rely on equanimity connected with unity to abandon equanimity connected with diversity. Rely on non-identification (atammayataṃ) to abandon equanimity connected with unity (second sentence only in Pāli version). (MN 137, III 220)

Encountering sensual pleasures can trigger dissatisfaction with the path and lust for the sensual pleasures. No one else can resolve this but oneself. One should dispel the dissatisfaction and arouse delight in the path. (SN 8.1, I 185)

There’s also Ānanda’s advice to Vaṅgīsa on how to overcome the sensual lust that was obsessing his mind:

It is through an inversion of perception
That your mind is engulfed by fire.
Turn away from the nimitta of beauty
Provocative of sensual lust.

See saṇkhāras as alien,
As dukkha, not as self.
Extinguish the great fire of lust;
Don’t burn up again and again.

Develop the mind on asubha,
Focused (ekaggaṃ), unified well;
Direct your mindfulness to the body,
Be engrossed in nibbidā.

Develop the signless
And discard the tendency to conceit.
Then, by breaking through conceit,
You will be one who fares at peace. (SN 8.4, I 188)

For me, this kind of substitution has long been the main thrust of my daily life practice. Initially, the substitution is of very basic things, like refraining from breaking the precepts. Then it moves into replacing coarser defilements, like ill will, with wholesome counterparts, like metta or forbearance. As understanding and insight grows with continued practice, it moves into replacing deluded perception with wise perception, as in the poem above. The mind gradually gets more and more purified of those things that cause dukkha to arise.

Of course, to substitute effectively, we also need right view to understand what’s the good stuff to cultivate and what’s the bad stuff to let go of, and we need right mindfulness to monitor the current situation—what’s there, what needs doing, what works well to replace the bad stuff with the good stuff. MN 117 talks about how these 3 states (right view, right effort, and right mindfulness) work together to power the development of each aspect of the eightfold path.

3 Likes

Yes, this is an exposition of the insight knowledges by the Commentary. From an old BPS PDF:

3 Likes

Excellent citations. Thank you for sharing your practice!

2 Likes

As for the defilements being countered by insight or knowledge, I think that the countering discernment comes from both knowledge and samatha.
SN 5.2 says "…when the mind is serene, and knowledge is present as you rightly discern the Dhamma. "
SN 45.159 is a relevant sutta too.
Venerable Sujato’s book A Swift Pair of Messengers focuses on these.

1 Like

Thanks for the book recommendation!

1 Like