I have kept my eyes and ears open for years for any evidence in the EBTs of Buddhist lay people eating meat or offering it to the Sangha. Today I came across another sutta. If anyone knows of any others, please give details! Here’s all that I have found so far:
1) AN 8.12 shows General Sīha buying meat to prepare and offer to the Buddha and the Sangha.
Parallels:
The parallel to this sutta is MA 18, but it seems to completely exclude the episode of Siha offering meat. The other parallels seem to be limited to 2 Vinaya texts in Chinese, and one in Pāli, none of which I have translations for. Can anyone confirm their contents and whether they confirm this episode?
Question: If this episode is also absent from those Chinese Vinaya parallels, does this exclude this as qualifying as an EBT?
Issues:
Siha had only become a Buddhist the day before, and him offering meat caused a big controversy. To me this implies that offering meat to the Sangha was abnormal, possibly even shocking. Since he had only just encountered Buddhism the day before, the simplest explanation seems to perhaps be that Buddhist lay people did not offer meat to the Sangha, but he didn’t know that yet.
2) Mahāparinibbāṇa Sutta
This is the famous case of the Buddha’s last meal. Most people think this was not in fact meat, though it seems uncertain. Anyway we cannot give this as an unambiguous case so cannot include it with any certainty.
3) AN 5.44 - Ugga of Vesālī offers the Buddha pork
My pork with jujube is agreeable:
Manāpaṁ me, bhante, sampannakolakaṁ sūkaramaṁsaṁ; Variant: sampannakolakaṁ sūkaramaṁsaṁ → sampannasūkaramaṁsaṁ (bj); sampannavarasūkaramaṁsaṁ (sya-all)
may the Buddha please accept it from me out of compassion.”
taṁ me bhagavā paṭiggaṇhātu anukampaṁ upādāyā”ti.
So the Buddha accepted it out of compassion.
Paṭiggahesi bhagavā anukampaṁ upādāya.
Parallels:
There are no parallels listed for this text. So can we therefore discount this as an EBT?
Issues
This text also states:
However, this plank of sandalwood is worth over a thousand dollars.
Idaṁ me, bhante, candanaphalakaṁ agghati adhikasatasahassaṁ;
May the Buddha please accept it from me out of compassion.”
taṁ me bhagavā paṭiggaṇhātu anukampaṁ upādāyā”ti.
So the Buddha accepted it out of compassion.
Paṭiggahesi bhagavā anukampaṁ upādāya.
Are there any confirmed EBTs where the Buddha or any other monk accepts something such as sandalwood? Would it not be against the vinaya to receive such a gift?
Also I see no indication in this text that Ugga is a Buddhist. Although if we believe the ‘Ugga of Vesālī’ of AN 8.21 is the same person, then it would seem he was indeed a lay devotee since soon after meeting the Buddha, and that this meat episode was near the end of his life, so it would seem he was already familiar with the dhamma when he purportedly offered meat. Nevertheless, due to the lack of parallels for the meat story (and the sandalwood issue?), it seems we cannot accept this story as necessarily being authentic/early.
These are the only instances I have ever come across. And since the only one confirmed by parallels (if it is confirmed by the Chinese vinayas?), is Sīha, who had encountered Buddhism only the day before and caused a huge controversy; combined with the ban on trading in meat; and the ban on killing; and the only explicit allowance for eating meat being the ‘beggars can’t be choosers’ which seems to have been a standard Sramana rule, leading even Mahavira to accept meat despite Jain lay people being vegetarian, the evidence so far seems to suggest that Buddhist lay followers may even have been vegetarian themselves, and may have had a clear policy to not offer the Sangha meat.
If anyone has any other EBT evidence to share, then please do.