I donât think that trying to consider material elements separate from the sensing of the material elements is a particularly useful pursuit. We only get our idea of an out-there by using the in-here. So itâs much better to consider it in the round.
In SN 35.23 we get:
And what is the all? Itâs just the eye and sights, the ear and sounds, the nose and smells, the tongue and tastes, the body and touches, and the mind and thoughts. This is called the all.
Mendicants, suppose someone was to say: âIâll reject this all and describe another all.â Theyâd have no grounds for that, theyâd be stumped by questions, and, in addition, theyâd get frustrated. Why is that? Because theyâre out of their element.â
And a little further along we get SN 35.33-42
âMendicants, all is liable to be reborn. And what is the all that is liable to be reborn? The eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact are liable to be reborn. And the pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises conditioned by eye contact is also liable to be reborn.
The ear ⌠nose ⌠tongue ⌠body ⌠The mind, thoughts, mind consciousness, and mind contact are liable to be reborn. And the pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises conditioned by mind contact is also liable to be reborn.
Seeing this a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned ⌠They understand: â⌠there is no return to any state of existence.ââ
âMendicants, all is liable to grow old. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to fall sick. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to die. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to sorrow. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to be corrupted. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to end. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to vanish. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to originate. âŚâ
âMendicants, all is liable to cease. âŚâ