Cool, thanks.
Nice of the Charleston Buddhist Fellowship to republish it!
It’s interesting that they add a disclaimer saying that “the doctrinal positions in the book are those of Theravada Buddhism”. I mean, apart from the fact that I have repeatedly said that I don’t agree with Theravada doctrine, why is it relevant? There must be some history behind it, I guess. It does, however, rather undermine the point of the whole thing, which is an argument based on facts, not on ideology.