I don’t think I’ve ever come across a distinction, but fwiw, here’s a seemingly unique case in MN 26, where ayamantimā jāti is employed in connection with the first five disciples:
[quote=“chansik_park, post:2, topic:3652”]
here’s a seemingly unique case in MN 26, where ayamantimā jāti is employed in connection with the first five disciples:[/quote]
Thank you. This is different to SN 22.59 (about the first five disciples), which states:
He understands: ‘Destroyed is birth, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more for this state of being.’