Thread for discussing chapter 8 of Warder for the class on September 19.
Meeting ID: 869 8997 6290
Passcode: 2023
4 Likes
Also, everyone might wanna get a head start on Lesson 8: heās introducing both the gerund and the present participle in the same lesson 
(along with many new uses of the instrumental 
) Should be a fun week! 
3 Likes
This book was originally published in the UK in 1963, the year I finished high school there. The students Warder prepared these lessons for had already learned these terms at school and were familiar with how they played out in at least English, French and Latin. So he wouldnāt have felt he was overloading us at all. 
1 Like
What Warder calls the āgerundā is better described as the āabsolutiveā, as āgerundā in English grammar is something very different.
3 Likes
Collins has a good overview of āabsolutiveā on p. 114.
He cites OED: āthe absolutive form of a word is that in which it is not inflected to indicate relation to other words in a sentence. ā
He also helpfully points out that a Pali absolutive can sometimes be rendered as a present participle.
In PÄli the gerund/absolutive and present participle are formally distinct. But in English gerund and present participle are easily confused as they have the same ending.
In English adding -ing to a verb forms the present participle. Eg swimming.>
Use the present participle with the verb to be to make the present continuous tense. Eg They are swimming in the ocean.
It can also be used as a noun. Eg Swimming is fun. This is called a gerund.
One has to wonder why itās not always called absolutive in PÄli.
Absolutely!
And also I always get confused between gerund and gerundive.
A useful reminder that grammatical rules in different languages are not the same āthingā; in fact, theyāre not a āthingā at all. Grammar is just a set of abstractions, and use of the same grammatical terms in different languages simply means, āsome linguists thought that this abstraction in this language is similar in some respects to that abstraction in that languageā.
4 Likes
Yes. Always.
We can choose between studying abstractions and learning a language.
Sometimes this or that abstraction helps language learning.
Many people are amazed that one doesnāt need to understand grammar to learn language.
A gerundive in English (do they happen in Pali?) is a present participle used as an adjective.
eg That swaying branch should be cut.
Cf gerund where it is used as an noun. eg Swaying isnāt good.
3 Likes
Yes, there is a āgerundiveā. Itās also known as the āfuture passive participleā and the āoptative participle. ā
(I think!)
Karaniya mettÄ sutta, Karaį¹Ä«yamatthakusalena ā¦e.g.
In the PED one needs to get used to the abbreviations for āgerundā vs. āgerundiveā.
2 Likes
Iām grateful for what heās done though Iām frustrated with how he did it.
But yes, I also thought that what you said was the case. Teachers would use tools that make it easier for students to understand. I believe that in his case, he didnāt expect the students to be linguists or grammarians, but only to understand Pali.
After two days of reading, Iāve made a note for myself (more like combining explanations from Mr Learn Pali, Ajahn Brahmali, Meiland and Warder). Please ignore the Thai words.
Iād be grateful If you tell me of any mistakes or confusing statements Iāve made.
Tomorrow I may have energy to do the exercisesā¦
Lesson 8 - Notes.pdf (1.3 MB)
3 Likes
Yes, indeed! Warder may be one of the only grammarians who calls the absolutive a gerund, which, as Stephen and Gillian have pointed out, is a different thing altogether. I suggest we all get in the habit of calling it absolutive.
One important thing to note about the absolutive is that it is used for stringing actions together for one subject (agent), which in English, we simply do with commas or the connector āandā.
Take the common set-up or preamble to many, many suttas in the canon - āSo and so got dressed in the morning, took their bowl and robe, and entered SÄvatthÄ« for almsā. Well, PÄli canāt say it this way like we do in English, since a sentence can only have one main verb.
Thus, the form it takes in PÄli is a string of absolutives for all the prior actions, ending in a main verb. Consequently the sentence above would be rendered, awkwardly-sounding in English āSo and so, having got dressed (absolutive) in the morning, having taken (abs.) their bowl and robe, entered (main verb) SÄvatthÄ« for almsā.
Hereās one example out of many taken from SN 3.9:
atha kho sambahulÄ bhikkhÅ« pubbaį¹hasamayaį¹ nivÄsetvÄ pattacÄ«varamÄdÄya sÄvatthiį¹ piį¹įøÄya pavisiį¹su.
Note, both nivÄsetvÄ and ÄdÄya are absolutives.
6 Likes
Thanks for the great explanation.
Gair & Karunatillake also use the term āgerundā sadly- someone should put out a new edition!
Your example helpfully shows the 2 common ways the absolutive is formed, the -ya suffix often for verbs with a prefix.
(And sometimes the -ya gets assimilated, making it less obvious, like in the absolutive āpaticcaā)
2 Likes
Steven and John, you are about to pull your hair out, but my defence is that students can only hear when they are ready to hear! When I saw this
I just thought, āI really wish someone had told me that a long time ago,ā it makes many things seem suddenly simple.
ā¦ but you probably did, both of you ā¦ Students can be so difficult!!!
4 Likes
This is probably why itās referred to as āabsolutiveā- an action that stands independent from the main action of the sentence.
Perhaps related to the absolute construction.
(Locative, genitive, etc. )
1 Like
So, a sentence in the Pali language can have only one main verb? Or, are you talking about both English and Pali?
In English you can. For example: I went to the shop and I bought groceries. āWentā and āboughtā are both main verbs. But in PÄli you would have to say: Having gone to the shop, I bought groceries. āHaving goneā would be an absolutive.
4 Likes
How about āThe Buddha went to the west, but Ananda went to the eastā? Two clauses with two subjects?
2 Likes
ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ Two sentences?
Iām not sure if you asked me or not, but let me try to respond:
A sentence is a unit of grammar. It must contain at least one main clause. It can contain more than one clause. In writing, a sentence typically ends with a full stop.
A clause is the basic unit of grammar. Typically a main clause is made up of a subject (s) (= a noun phrase) and a verb phraseā¦ Main (or independent) clauses can form sentences on their own. They arenāt dependent on other clauses. They are always finite (they must contain a verb which shows tense).
Subordinate (or dependent) clauses cannot form sentences on their own. They are dependent on main clauses to form sentences. ā Cambridge Grammar
My question above is whether Pali can have two independent clauses, both of which have a finite verb(s).
2 Likes