Is the santipada 4th edition the most popular version?
Or ayye Suddina’s version? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Lr9RWgOZ0GlALTv8oG9BNcvT0GS5jTm6/view?usp=drivesdk
Or something else?
- Santipada’s version 4th edition
- Ayye Suddina’s version
- Something else, please comment
It’s interesting to note that ayye Suddina’s version has for Pārājika 2, coriṃ, whereas santipada and sutta central uses coraṃ.
And for NP 20, she used the female veyyāvaccakarā, appointed from ārāmikā vā upāsikā vā.
In pārājika 6, inside the dialogue, the optative form is used. Paṭicodeyyaṃ, āroceyyanti as opposed to santipada’s paṭicodessaṃ, ārocessanti.
I can only find PTS Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga has that form for the pārājika 6.
Whereas there’s a lot of differences in terms of the rules which are the same as Bhikkhu ones, on how consistent are all the terms converted to feminine form.
I am in the middle of making, checking, learning for the first time and memorizing the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha, Anki memorization deck, so I want to see what versions are out there being used, and if it’s ok to make my own version.
As I see still some more things on the Ayye Suddina’s version which can be transformed into more feminine version. Like NP20, why suddenly have Bhikkhave there? Shouldn’t the Buddha be addressing Bhikkhuniyo to the Bhikkhunīs when laying down this rule for them? Or the monk who pass on this rule to them address the nuns as Bhikkhuniyo? This strange inconsistency is also present in the Santipada’s version.
Also, anyone has audio of Santipada’s version which is accurate to the long and short sound, international Pali pronunciation (not Thai or Myanmar pronunciation), accurate, and clearly discernable by the ear?