Bhikkhu Bodhi cites Khandhaka 1.4.1–1.4.5 to support his statement that the first disciples of the Buddha were two lay merchants, Tapussa and Bhallika–not the group of five ascetics. According to the text, following his enlightenment, the Buddha sat for seven dats at the Rajayatana tree experiencing bliss. Tapussa and Bhallika were told about the Buddha by a devata, and the two went to the tree to serve the Buddha food. They then said: “We, Blessed One, go to the Blessed One for refuge and to the Dhamma for refuge. Let the Blessed One accept us as lay-disciples for life from from this day forth.” Therefore, according to Ven. Bodhi, the first disciples of the Buddha were lay people, and only took refuge in two jewels, as there was no sangha in which to take refuge! My understand was that first version of the Vinaya was transcribed during the second council–is that the case? If so, it would make the version contained in the suttas (five ascetics as the first disciples, forming the Sangha) as an earlier account. That might make it seem more accurate, but what do others think? Is this an ongoing controversy of some sort?
Not that I’m aware of.
1 Like
That story can be found at The story of Trapuṣa (Trapusa) and Bhallika [Chapter XXVIII]
So then, is it accepted that the Buddha received these two lay disciples prior to meeting with the group of five who formed the first sangha?
1 Like
Yes And between the two lay followers and the group of five was the Ājīvaka ascetic Upaka who was sceptical of the Buddha’s claim to be foremost in the world. (Though it is said he came around eventually!)
2 Likes
Thank you for clearing this up for me.
Paul
2 Likes