(You might want to edit your post because AI generated content is banned on the forums).
To me, this comes naturally since childhood, and I’m pretty sure it’s not related to samadhi, but a level of concentration is still required (especially for image manipulation). However, I can see that if samadhi is your gateway to such experiences, then losing samadhi (or the things that make you lose samadhi, like doubt or anger or other negative emotions) can loop you out of it.
High level autists and people with photographic memories can have access to these kind of things, again, sometimes when relaxed, sometimes intrusively. So, I wouldn’t say mental image alone is a good benchmark for samadhi, but samadhi might make such experiences easier to access, if that makes sense.
One of the things that differentiate Buddhadhamma JhanaTM from other Jhanas / Samadhis is the Right View that goes into it. Other sorts of samadhi experiences are called micchasamādhi in the Pāli Canon:
Furthermore, Bodhisattva practices 4 formless immersions before his enlightenment, so his teachers were familiar with those kind of samadhis. Likewise, it’s highly likely that 4 Brahmavihara samadhis are not unique to Buddhism (and they’re actually of secondary importance in the suttas, since they only lead as far as non-return, rather than full release). Therefore, we have at least 8 samadhi experiences that are shared with different paths.
Seeing how 4th Jhana is often touted as the gateway to all the mystical experiences, it’s likely that other meditators can access something similar, since they have similar mystical experiences themselves.
The key difference would be the attitude towards the experience. A buddhist is said to view even jhanic experiences as dukkha, and to seek higher and subtler experiences; whereas another practitioner might identify with, cherish and delight in the experience. Whether this attitude towards the same thing actually makes it a different thing or not, you be the judge of that. ![]()