Confused about SN29 (Chapter on Dragons)

This section of the SN contains four chapters, which are about nāga, supaṇṇa, gandhabba deva & valāhaka deva. These four classes of beings (sattanikāye) are described differently in the following ways:

  1. Per SN 31.2 & SN 32.2, gandhabba deva & valāhaka deva are deva (gods) because they have performed “good conduct” (“sucaritaṁ”).

  2. Per SN 29.3 & SN 30.3, the nāga & supaṇṇa are so because their past conduct was “mixed” or “both kinds” (“dvayakārino”).

  3. Per SN 29.3 & SN 30.3, both the nāga & supaṇṇa are described as long-lived, beautiful and very happy.

  4. SN 29.3 says the nāga keep the sabbath (uposatha) so they can go to/be reborn in a heavenly world.

  5. SN 30.2 says supaṇṇa “carry off” or “plunder” (" harati") the nāga. It seems the supaṇṇa are more powerful than the nāga; yet both are powerful because supaṇṇa born from an egg can only carry off nāga born from an egg but not those nāga born from a womb, from moisture or spontaneously (etc).

  6. SN 30.3 does not seem to mention the supaṇṇa keeping the sabbath (uposatha).

We should keep in mind, for the most part, the suttas (e.g. AN 6.39) equate the godly & human beings with good kamma & equate the animal, ghost & hell beings with bad kamma.

Therefore, it seems a “nāga” is a powerful being yet between the animal realm & the godly realm because they perform mixed kamma. Also, nāga have the aspiration to go to a better place, such as heaven. Where as, possibly due to their power, the supaṇṇa are content to remain as supaṇṇa. :slightly_smiling_face:

5 Likes