What are some debates involving the interpretation of the Pali Canon that have well-studied positions on both sides? (By “well-studied” I simply mean that academic studies grounded in critical thinking find reasons to support a certain position.) So far, I am aware of debates on the concept of anatta and the admissibility of unilateral bhikkhuni ordination. What else has generated scholarly debate? If you can provide direct links to sources that describe positions on the topic, that would be helpful. And let’s try to avoid debating the issues themselves in this thread; I am simply interested in an outline of areas in dispute. My opening question is intentionally open-ended.