I am really happy you are here with us, Cara. The lack of strong female voices in Dhamma discussion has often been something bothering me, it’s like missing some crucial things or new perspectives on things just because you are a man, so if I can do something specific to make this forum a more welcoming place for ladies, I am down
Here’s my problem. I first studied linguistics as a single male student among fourty-something ladies. Then I started studying media sciences where male students make up around 20 % of the students. The situation is perfectly analagous to female students in the STEM fields. Moreover, my personal experience as well as that of my girlfriend shows men are on the average wa-a-a-a-ay worse in learning foreign languages or non-math related linguistics than women, or quite often have good language abilities but are socially discouraged from learning languages. However, the social reaction to this disparity is vastly different than the discussion around women and the STEM field. There is no social reaction at all, at least not any reaction I am aware of, no reaction I could come across in the media. I wouldn’t call it distribution of privilege, it’s more like _re-_destribution of prvilege.
The lack of a positive male image here in Europe is another big issue. Women here have a pretty good idea of what the society thinks is commendable female behaviour, like being strong, independent, having a career or scientifical aspirations. Being a housewife is perceived as something negative - whether it is just or good is another question altogether, the important thing is there is wide social consensus of how women should be. Men, on the opposite have no clue whatsoever. I know nobody who would have an idea what being a strong modern man means. This positive ideal is described in negative terms: a modern man shouldn’t do this and that and hold such and such opinions. Negative descriptions are saidly not something you can make good use of in real life.
If you don’t mind, I will go on a small tangent here. I am very much aware about the problem of sexism but sometimes I get the feeling that sometimes the approach to solving it is a bit odd. Quite often, it goes more like ‘women are underprivileged, we have to make them equal to men’, an approach emphasizing the woman/man division, and as every approach based on (even implicit or subconscious) antagonism, it will inevitably end up in injustice towards one of the groups, either women or men. Right now, the problems of men that definitely do exist are unquestionably to a large extent ignored by the society because it is more interested in solving women’s problems. Solving women’s problem is great and necessary, don’t get me wrong, but hey What I would be rather happy to see is the ‘all people are equal’ approach that doesn’t explicitly raise the question of gender at all. Mind you, it doesn’t mean ignoring sexism if there is sexism, it is more about ignoring the gender where it is not relevant, e.g. in a discussion of Hillary Clinton. In this approach, fighting against sexism is not about respect and support, it is more about being surprised when encountering any mentions of gender in an inapprorpiate context. Surprised that someone thinks women are dumber or women cannot be ordained as nuns or women shouldn’t be scientists. Surprised that the gender was mentioned at all. There is in my opinion no need for resepect and support for a person because they are gay, straight, female, male, white or a person of colour, all of these things should rather be totally and uncompromisingly ignored where appropriate. We should judge, support and respect a person the way Martin Luther Kings dreamt of - by the contents of their character - and their belonging to a minority should be a thing of the past. Because as soon as you say ‘minority’, there is a division, antagonism. There are no minorities, there are no men and women, no gay or straight, no black or white, college graduates and school drop-outs, just people:
Whatever living beings there may be;
Whether they are weak or strong, omitting none,
The great or the mighty, medium, short or small,
The seen and the unseen,
Those living near and far away,
Those born and to-be-born —
May all beings be at ease!