Inflections in bhavā "feminine." Is it having any meaning?

Q & A
1

accusative. plural. feminine. bhavā => ?

2

according to the dictonary bhava is masculine

https://suttacentral.net/define/bhava

according to the Pali Noun Declension Table 1 x A 4 Bold bhavā is plural nominative for masculine ending with -a

nominative is because it’s the subject of the sentence

ahaṁ and me are irrelevant here, this was already resolved earlier

3

The combination of the two words.
Therefore, it is possible to omit the declension?

For example, it is possible in this way?

Ayaṁ: demonstrative. pronoun. “this, he”=> plural. m. ime
Tayo: numeral. card. three. ; nominative. m. tayo

these three(nominative.)

This article was use an English dictionary and Google translator.

4

@alalfhr
I answered this in your other discussion:

Perhaps you missed it.

@alalfhr
I think bhavā is the plural for bhava which is a masculine noun ending in a. It has to be plural as it’s referring to three (tayo) states, ie “There are, friend, these three states of existence)…”

5

“Draft Translation” was translated into Korean and trying to finish the job.

I think that part of this in the right way.
I like to go back to the original point.

There is one question in this section.

these(plural. nominative. m. ) three(nominative. m. )

“nominative.” This part is repeated.

It should be translated in two parts,
If not, think of what to omit one thing during those two things.