I won’t be posting each and every video that Doug produces, but this vid on Metta I felt very worth including here. Thanks again, @dougsmith . I offer this posting to invite comments and discussion of the themes of this fine video Doug has produced.
Doug provides a very nice history of the developments through time of Metta as a practice, from the time of the Buddha through the Visuddhimagga. Doug also nicely references the incoporation of Metta into modern practices of the development of self-compassion and self-care.
Doug describes the practice of Metta as depicted in the Visuddhimagga as an “innovation” by Buddhaghosa, this being the more familiar practice of Metta cultivation for ourselves and the three other individuals ( loved one, neutral, and hostile person). Having not studied the Visuddhimagga, and seeing the practice of Metta through the Early Texts and the Metta Sutta, I can’t fully agree that the Early Texts were silent as to the cultivation of Metta for oneself. It seems Metta was a pre-Buddhist practice of the Jains, and known to the Brahmins, and was incorporated by the Buddha in, perhaps, a more or less mature form. The Metta bhavana within the Buddha’s time would, by necessity and implication, develop from a foundation of Metta for oneself, and that Metta would then be cultivated with others as the object. One can’t “trumpet” this quality unless one has the “music” in one’s own heart, it seems to me. This may not be described in specific terms in the early texts ( but for "all beings) , but I do feel that the bhavana of Metta for oneself would be integral, or at least very much implied in the early Suttas. Again, I am reluctant to write this as I do not have the history of quality scholarship that Doug has invested, and I am not a student of the Visuddhimagga. I may, in fact, be talking out of my a** here, which would not be first for me.