SN 32.53 and previously discussed Valāhakā Devā, who are deities of the weather controlling the clouds
I will just post the whole sutta here its really short
Sāvatthinidānaṁ.
Seated to one side, that mendicant said to the Buddha:
Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho so bhikkhu bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:
“Sir, what is the cause, what is the reason why sometimes it becomes cool?”
“ko nu kho, bhante, hetu, ko paccayo, yenekadā sītaṁ hotī”ti?
“Mendicant, there are what are called gods of the cool thunderclouds.
“Santi, bhikkhu, sītavalāhakā nāma devā.
Sometimes they think:
Tesaṁ yadā evaṁ hoti:
‘Why don’t we revel in our own kind of enjoyment?’ Then, in accordance with their wish, it becomes cool.
‘yannūna mayaṁ sakāya ratiyā vaseyyāmā’ti, tesaṁ taṁ cetopaṇidhimanvāya sītaṁ hoti. Variant: ratiyā vaseyyāmā’ti → rameyyāmāti (bj, sya-all, km, pts1ed)
This is the cause, this is the reason why sometimes it becomes cool.”
so that thread of course discusses the obvious like “this betrays naturalistic understanding, physics”.
July 2020 after some construction tasks someone working with said to me “I don’t believe the buddha said that” and they thought maybe latter addition.
I was like surprised because it seemed straight forward and coherent with what buddha said in MN1. Where when I’ve read that interpreted the delight/relishing akin to the “ah! what was that” like a kind of ignorance that wants to do with, etc. that takes back to like senses from samatha meditation
Simularly in November 2022 this topic of the “weird suttas” about the cloud devas came up chatting to someone “oh I think it’s like MN1 - the delight - world arises” and sort of simular reaction, except this person understood what I meant
Anyway, just wanted to leave this note here incase if there’s ways it’s total misinterpretation. I don’t know pali or anything it just seemed seems coherent with how interpreting or understanding rest of suttas.
With metta
