I am creating a new thread since this is getting off-topic in its original thread, but I think it merits some discussion nonetheless.
So let me start here
Page 15 of Font-Clos in particular makes a relatively convincing argument that stream-entry, in terms of a hierarchy of the progressive difficulty of attainments, would come before the first jhana.
I assume you are referring to this passage:
when a disciple abandons the three fetters and, afterwards, enters in the first jhana, were he or she to die at that moment the result would be non-return (A 3.94, i242). Therefore, even the first jhana alone implies freedom from the five lower fetters, never less than that.
which in turn refers to this passage:
AN 3.94
yato ariyasÄvakassa virajaį¹ vÄ«tamalaį¹ dhammacakkhuį¹ uppajjati, saha dassanuppÄdÄ, bhikkhave, ariyasÄvakassa tÄ«į¹i saį¹yojanÄni pahÄ«yanti ā sakkÄyadiį¹į¹hi, vicikicchÄ, sÄ«labbataparÄmÄso.when the stainless, immaculate vision of the teaching arises in a noble
disciple, three fetters are given up: identity view, doubt, and misapprehension of precepts and
observances.āathÄparaį¹ dvÄ«hi dhammehi niyyÄti abhijjhÄya ca byÄpÄdena ca. so vivicceva kÄmehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaį¹ savicÄraį¹ vivekajaį¹ pÄ«tisukhaį¹ paį¹hamaį¹ jhÄnaį¹ upasampajja viharati. tasmiį¹ ce, bhikkhave, samaye ariyasÄvako kÄlaį¹ kareyya, natthi taį¹ saį¹yojanaį¹ yena saį¹yojanena saį¹yutto ariyasÄvako puna imaį¹ lokaį¹ ÄgaccheyyÄāti.
Afterwards they get rid of two things: desire and aversion. Quite secluded from sensual
pleasures, secluded from unskillful qualities, they enter and remain in the first absorption,
which has the rapture and bliss born of seclusion, while placing the mind and keeping it
connected. If that noble disciple passed away at that time, theyāre bound by no fetter that
might return them to this world.ā
The sutta absolutely doesnāt say what Mr FontClos says it does. It says that if a stream enterer dies while in first jhana, he becomes a non-returner. Nowhere whatsoever does it say that the first jhana canāt be achieved by one who is not a stream-enterer.
I think Mr FontClos should think twice before writing such articles that create such confusion, and people like Tricycle should think twice before publishing him.
In a passage which is almost comical, so that one would wonder if this is not a parody of on-the-nose sophistry, he admits that his theory is explicitly refuted in a sutta:
Despite all this, one text in the Majjhima nikaya places stream-entry after attainment of jhana in an ascending enumeration (M 6, i 34). Besides this one exception, it is quite clear that the relationship of stream-entry with states of concentration is that it leads to them; their actual consummation already corresponds to higher stages.
Here is the passage from MN 6:
āÄkaį¹ kheyya ce, bhikkhave, bhikkhu ā ātiį¹į¹aį¹ saį¹yojanÄnaį¹ parikkhayÄ sotÄpanno assaį¹ avinipÄtadhammo niyato sambodhiparÄyaį¹oāti, sÄ«lesvevassa paripÅ«rakÄrÄ« ajjhattaį¹ cetosamathamanuyutto anirÄkatajjhÄno vipassanÄya samannÄgato brÅ«hetÄ suƱƱÄgÄrÄnaį¹.
A mendicant might wish: āMay I, with the ending of three fetters, become a stream-enterer, not
liable to be reborn in the underworld, bound for awakening.ā So let them fulfill their precepts, be committed to inner serenity of the heart, not neglect absorption, be endowed with discernment, and frequent empty huts.
Here we can also see that to attain stream-entry, the sutta says that one should practice samatha (āserenityā), jhÄna (arguably part of āConcentrationā), and vipassanÄ (Insight).
Despite that, Mr Font Cos has the audacity of printing:
Stream-entry is nowhere an attainment that results from either concentration or insight practices. In fact, the lowest fruit of satipatthana practice is thedestruction of the five lower fetters (M 10.46, i 63; S 54.5, v 314).
So my advice would be to stay away from the writings of Mr Font Clos because he seems to be quite confused and to export his confusion in other peopleās minds.
How his writings pass for high level Buddhist studies and how he gets to be printed in a major Buddhist outlet is beyond me.