The US magazine The Nation is the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the United States, and the most widely read weekly journal of progressive political and cultural news, opinion, and analysis.
https://www.thenation.com/article/what-patriotism/
What is Patriotism?
We invited friends and colleagues to address the question of just what patriotism is and ought be: Is there a patriotism that is not nationalistic? How does the historic internationalism of the liberal left relate to the concept of patriotism? What do you value in the traditions of your country?
My favorite closing sentence from the collection of short essays: Obviously weāre the real patriots. How come THEY canāt understand that?
John Schaar: ā¦ those who have called themselves patriots or who have called others to the banner of patriotism have largely fallen into two camps.
The first company, whose signature is on so many of the bloodiest pages of the modern age, has its spiritual roots in the radical ideologies of the French Revolution. They announced the advent of a new god on earth and a new prophet/commander whose voice was the voice of that god. The new god, of course, was la patrie, the nation, and the new commander was the state.
ā¦ The other company of patriots does not march to military time. It prefers the gentle strains of āAmerica the Beautifulā to the strident cadences of āHail to the Chiefā and āThe Stars and Stripes Forever.ā This patriotism is rooted in the love of oneās own land and people, love too of the best ideals of oneās own culture and tradition. This company of patriots finds no glory in puffing their country up by pulling othersā down. This patriotism is profoundly municipal, even domestic. Its pleasures are quiet, its services steady and unpretentious.
This patriotism too has deep roots and long continuity in our history. Its voice is often temporarily shouted down by the battle cries of the first company, but it has never been stilled. Jefferson spoke for it, as did Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr.
We should not be surprised if this voice is often heard lamenting or rebuking the countryās failures to live up to its own best ideals ā¦
Floyd Abrams, Constitutional lawyer:
The left has always had a problem with patriotism. ā¦ as a general matter the left seems sour on America and more sour still about patriotism.
Moreās the pity. Itās not that the right hasnāt routinely substituted flag-waving for reason. Or even that a dumb, smug and myopic sort of Americanism hasnāt been used to justify every national sin of which weāve been capable. But none of that even begins to excuse the disdain with which the left greets even a tip of a patriotic hat.
ā¦ Why such a crabbed view of Americanism at its best? Why not celebrate Justice Brennan? Or Justices Marshall and Blackmun? Or the 200th anniversary of the Bill of Rights? Or a message of freedom beamed from America to the rest of the world that has often been received there but too often has been denigrated here?
What the left criticizes about America is often worth criticizing. Its unwillingness to celebrate what we offer the world at our bestāand to call that patriotismāis not to its intellectual or moral credit.
Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven:
We take patriotism to mean love of nation and the loyalty that follows. My country right or wrong. Even as an abstract idea, it is hard to see how thinking people justify blind loyalty. And considered historically, patriotism is plainly dangerous, helping to unleash military rampages in the name of nation and obliterating the essential democratic capacity to assess concrete and particular interests.
Richard Falk: Professor of international relations, Princeton University: Confusing patriotism with unconditional support for government policy does core damage to the meaning of citizenship, especially during time of war. In 1736 Lord Bolingbroke identified the essence of patriotic fervor as devotion to the public good, whether as official or citizen. To uphold a policy that is believed harmful to the country is then, with such an understanding, highly unpatriotic, exhibiting either weakness of spirit or fear of consequences.
William Sloane Coffin:
The worst patriots are those who hold certainty dearer than truth, who, in order to spare themselves the pain of thought, are willing to inflict untold sufferings on others.
ā¦ But if uncritical lovers of their country are the most dangerous of patriots, loveless critics are hardly the best. If you love the good you have to hate evil, else youāre sentimental; but if you hate evil more than you love the good, youāre a good hater.
Surely the best patriots are those who carry on not a grudge fight but a loverās quarrel with their country. And the main burden of their quarrel in todayās and tomorrowās world must be to persuade their fellow citizens ā¦
The ancient Roman Tacitus defined patriotism as entering into praiseworthy competition with our ancestors. I think we should enter into praiseworthy competition with Washington and Jefferson. As they declared their independence from England, let us declare our interdependence with all countries.
Martin Duberman, Professor of history:
Who isnāt a patriot? Everybody claims the designation and claims loyalty to the particular set of ideals and institutional arrangements they choose to identify as the essence of Americanism. Those of us who deplore the countryās current descent into macho militarism refuse to cede patriotism to those who equate it with George Bushās policies. We hold to a set of values older than Bush and more enduring than a single (misguided) administration.
ā¦
Obviously weāre the real patriots. How come THEY canāt understand that?
Stephen F. Cohen, Director, Russian studies, Princeton University
Patriotism is never having to say you didnāt know.