Hi @Viveka
What the Buddha taught, people very much debate about this, right? We can have a different understanding based on exactly the same texts. That is normal. What i see is that this or that understanding can be supported by this and that texts and other understanding with this and that texts. In the end texst cannot be descive.
I am not sure at all that the Buddha teaches that all about ourselves is made, produced, formed, conditioned. I think he taught that what is produced about us, formed, conditionally arising, is exactly not Me, not mine, not myself.
I like the simile of the sea. Those formations are waves on the sea and the mind can instinctively grasp at them as me and myself, but that does not make us waves. Once grasped we can get lost in a sense of individuality, uniqueness, personal existence (thinking we are waves) but it this really the total truth about us?
I do not think so. Not all about us is formed, conditioned, unstable. There is also something which does not change, is unmade, and conditioning has no impact on it too. This does not mean there must be an eternal soul or self.
If all we are is 5 khandhaâs, and those end at death when we get enlightend, we, ofcourse do not exist anymore after death. The Buddha does not teach this position. Why? I belief at death only what-we-are-not ceases. What we in deepest sense are does and cannot cease. The enlightend mind knows this, and that is its refuge, its security, its home, its peace, its fearlesness. It knows only suffering can cease.
The enlightend mind knows what home is. It has really found home, in the deep see. I belief this is what the Buddha tries to express. He sought a home for himself (Snp.4.15)
The world around was hollow,
all directions were in turmoil.
Wanting a home for myself,
I saw nowhere unsettled.
This home is, i belief, a designation for the unmade, unbecome, unproduced. He saw that this is home for every living being, like the deep non-moving sea. But beings do not see this and have only attention for what moves but do not recognise themselves in what is not moving. They do not see how deep they really are. How limitless, vast, unfathomable, ungraspable their nature (AN)
Grasping khandhaâs is being not at home, self-alienated. Not seeing ones true deep untfathomable nature. Not knowing what is really home. Only seeing things that move.
In non-grasping one is at home. But this is always there. It is not that Buddha created this home for himself, he re-discovered it. He just brought all grasping to an end and the natural result is, being at home, fearlessness, safety, peace etc.
Strangely enough getting home is a real issue because we are for such a long time lost in formations and have no eye at all for our unmoving, unfathomable, ungraspable deep nature.
Not seeing this home, not knowing this Path to the Unmade is what a Buddha destructs. That is the ignorant part. He opens the eyes for something that is always there and is itself no formation.
If the asankhata would not be a part of what we are, than there is no refuge for us, no escape, no safety, no home But i choose to belief Buddha teaches that there is.