[quote=“sujato, post:5, topic:1032, full:true”][quote=“Florifulgurator, post:4, topic:1032”]
- quite a bad argument
[/quote]
I disagree: it is in fact the argument. […]
[/quote]
Thanks a lot for this clarification. (This is one reason why I’m seeking contact with “traditional” sangha. Presently I’m mostly a “nonmetaphysical armchair Buddhist” with a lot of books, but still insufficient study…)
Now there we are: Yet another rebirth debate…
If you like to.
So I keep myself short:
Yes, I also regard the Buddha a Copernicus. A Copernicus of mind.
But not for the rebirth doctrine. For me it is “empirical” only in the sense that Buddha has seen it (but only in his mind) while gaining the 3 knowledges under the Bodhi tree. Else, it is microcosmos-macrocosmos parallelism. And this I generally regard a serious and dangerous fallacy, even childish. It is also at the core of Brahminism and the atman thinking.
Scholars seem to be divided if the Buddha rejected or employed microcosmos-macrocosmos parallelism. (Me, I’m not yet sure about the “fathom high corpse” pericope, but I tend to take it as epistemological advice and not as endorsing m-m parallelism.)
So, here’s the difference to the Copernican revolution: It was the insight that the laws of physics are the same everywhere in the outside physical world. It is not saying that some law we figure in our minds needs to have any bearing in the outside world.
[quote=“sujato, post:5, topic:1032, full:true”]The Gita is adapting Buddhist ideas, not the other way around. Buddhists and Hindus agreed about some things and disagreed about others—so what?
[/quote]Thanks for your opinion. Yeah, right: So what?
I’m not knowledgable enough to have a final word here. But some say the Gita came into being around the time of the Buddha and contains some of the oldest Brahminical philosophy.
(I’m not an indologist and not a language genius. I’m a bit too stupid for all this. That’s why I studied maths instead… But the delusions of contemporary mankind are serious enough (6th planetary crisis of Life) to warrant deep study: “Why is the earth silent at this destruction?” --Heidegger. Latest example: §50 in Francis’ encyclica: Refusing to see the other elephant in the room (population pressure), shifting blame to those who see it.)
Respectful greetings
from Germany,
Martin