Evola in this sense was also certain that buddhism because of this openly supported the caste system.
In confirmation of this is the fact that the establishment and diffusion of Buddhism never in later centuries caused dissolution of the caste system—even today in Ceylon this system continues undisturbed side by side with Buddhism; while, in Japan, Buddhism lives in harmony with hierarchical, traditional, national, and warrior concepts. Only in certain Western misconceptions is Buddhism—considered in later and corrupted forms—presented as a doctrine of universal compassion encouraging humanitarianism and democratic equality."
From the same area of the book as the last quote. Evola was certain that kindness in the buddha dharma was all together a corruption that had no place in it, favoring masculine anger and violence and “virlity” he outlined in his works on the LHP and hindu tantra.
Evola’s exclusivist thinking is a byproduct of european orientalism, the same that he critiques. He’s effectively managed to make a buddhism that has nothing to do with the dhamma itself, but revolves around germanic-italian fascism and identity politics. His conception itself of Aryan referring to a pure race of people (perfect whites) comes down from Thulean misappropriation of doctrines that come from Helena Blavatsky, who thought aryans were sentient mushroom men that lived in Hyperborea and used the swastika as their symbol.
When you get down to it, fascist ideology just does not mesh with buddhism, it’s all very nonsensical.