Risky Business—secular materialism is the philosophy of the apocalypse

We have relentlessly scoured the sacred from the world, filling the earth’s veins with acid, scoffing contemptuously at those who worship the sky and the rivers. We point and laugh at how useless their endless rites were, how cruel their sacrifices; and how, even when they served their gods properly with ritual and oblation, they were still struck with drought or failure.

Yet it is a singular fact that none of them, not a single one of the supposedly benighted superstitions of the past, bequeathed us a planet decimated with ruin. When it comes to apocalypse, religions like to talk big. We speak of the end of the world, our words laden with prophecy and portent. Yet our dooms are, in the end, domestic affairs, more local tragedy than global annihilation.

Could it be that the ancient traditions of the world did, in fact, hold a precious wisdom, one through which humanity was able to find its balance in nature? Could it be that the arrogant, reductive elimination of myth and meaning, of the divinity in the stars, is leading to the exact result foretold in the ancient wisdom?

Hereafter, when kings shall be stingy and unrighteous, and when folk shall be unrighteous, in days when the world is perverted, when good is waning and evil waxing apace—in those days of the world’s discontent there shall fall no rain from the heavens, the feet of the storm shall be lamed, the crops shall wither, and famine shall be on the land. Then shall the clouds gather as if for rain from the four quarters of the heavens, but they shall flee away without raining. (Jātaka 77)


https://lokanta.github.io/2024/11/07/risky-business/

10 Likes

Totally agree (in 20 characters).

We seem to loose more and more contact with what is not part of conceit and conceiving. We are increasingly unable to make contact with that dimension in our lifes that is beyond good and bad, free of conceit and conceiving, that holy dimension that the arahant abides in.

Because we have, as were, lost our ground, all that thinking, reasoning, conceiving, has become our total world. This is really a problematic development.

The ancient wisdom of Buddha, for example, makes us see our ground again, free from conceiving and conceit. But ancient wisdom that only feeds our conceit and love for conceiving cannot help, i believe. To see divinity in stars, worship the sun etc, see a livin soul in everything, i believe can have some positive effects but is not really a solution. Because that only strenghtens conceiving.

The world has become all about conceit and conceiving and that is its ruin. It ruins a person, it ruins a society, it ruins the world to be blinded for what is free of conceit and conceivings.

Homo sapiens has not lived in harmony with the natural world since probably before our ancestors stepped out of our home continent of Africa and began spreading out into the world. In Africa the mega-fauna there evolved alongside our ancestors. They developed the innate knowledge to avoid our species, hence why so many species of African mega-fauna have survived until recently, yet now even they are threatened.

As we left Africa, everywhere our ancestors roamed, death and eventual extinction followed. Mega-fauna was decimated, going extinct in short order, most often with one or two millennia - a flash on the geological scale. Mega-fauna that had survived ice-ages coming and going for millions of years wiped out in short order as we entered their habitats, began hunting them and in doing so irreparably destroyed biomes and ecosystems.

And that was when we were in our hunter/gather stage. Things have grown much, much worse as we developed agriculture, and grew civilizations. As of now, humans, and our food-animals, occupy around 90% of global vertebrae animal life.

Imho, while it feels good to believe that Homo sapiens has the potential to be a wholly benevolent creature, to believe that we once lived in harmony with nature is both ignorant and delusion.

I take solace in the knowledge that nature bats last.

Bhante, thank you for gifting us with this essay.

Many people who are deeply spiritual or religious may start reading this and say, Well, of course. I’m not a secular materialist. And I agree with everything you say.

But isn’t that another way industrialized culture has conditioned us to reflect on things?

For me, it begs the question of communal reflection and morality. Or putting on that lens and re-reading the essay.

Before the triumph of industry, people saw the earth as sacred. They would worship the gods, make a sacrifice, and pray for the abundance of this year’s crop. They believed that if they lived well, and their leaders were righteous, they would flourish…

Much of this was in community – you paint several moving allusions to this.

Could it be that the ancient traditions of the world did, in fact, hold a precious wisdom, one through which humanity was able to find its balance in nature? Could it be that the arrogant, reductive elimination of myth and meaning, of the divinity in the stars, is leading to the exact result foretold in the ancient wisdom?..

But I’m not debating philosophical possibilities here. I’m pointing to the historical reality that the ascendancy of industrialized materialism has been accompanied by the rejection of the sacredness of all things and the embrace of materialist secularism…

Industrialization and modernity (secular materialism) ushered in whole generations of people who stopped reflecting on myth and meaning together. People stopped learning to be with others this way. They didn’t have the time or the energy after long days of trying to keep pace with the hockey stick GDP.

Instead, people became individually responsible for engaging in this wholly communal project. In the process, I feel people also stopped learning to reflect each other’s goodness to one another.

White culture is particularly susceptible because of ingrained habits of excluding people from their communities. They isolate within well-groomed neighborhoods with little exposure to other, diverse communities which are more fluent in ways of being together.

Unsurprisingly, in our sanitized communities people increasingly take to social media for glimpses of their own goodness and value. They look for mirrors that tell them how valuable and loved they are. (AI’s great for that.)

The great sin of our time, the great sin of all time, has been aided and abetted by religious leaders—weak in faith, backwards in knowledge, secret devotees of matter—who, rather than recognizing madness and evil for what it is, choose to ally themselves with the great lie of industrialized materialism: that you can have whatever you want and never have to pay the price.

I was recently thinking about the preponderance of sacrifice in the Bible’s Old Testament. It wasn’t because people felt personally responsible for somehow falling short. It’s because the community felt responsible for falling short. The prophets famously point out just how misaligned the community is with Yahweh’s ideals and the demands of his character.

The physical earth is now the prophet trying to wake up the community.

Modern advocates of Buddhism often present their vision as an essentially rational one that seems little different from a materialist account. Yet in the early Buddhist texts we find nature is imbued with all manner of divinity.

Yeah, they’re all online charging people for staring at them through a computer or mobile screen. Backgrounds are blurred out to reduce potential distractions. No signs of earth life, dusty cabinets, the chaos of life lived together. Just consume my content and go practice on your own. It’s really great.

No, we’re not secular materialists. Of course not.

By the way, once everyone gets to Mars, what will be doing together? Because we won’t know how to be together. So maybe the SpaceX project can include this in the project plan. We’re going to get soooo bored…

Or is the project really To Serve Man? (You only need to watch the first five minutes.)

2 Likes

When are we going to accept that capitalism is the problem and that an economic system whose motive is endless profits inevitably decimates the earth? Are we going to fight for something better or just let the earth burn because “well capitalism is the only system that works?” In just a couple hundred years this system has decimated ecosystems and created a mass extinction event, ushering in a time of unprecedented climate change since the age of mammals on this planet about 50 million years ago.

Let’s not uphold the violence of the political and economic systems we live under and address it head on: capitalism and its imperial wars are destroying this planet and we have to change that if we want a future.

1 Like

The philosopher Thomas Nagel, knowing he was oversimplifying a bit, once wrote that ethics comes down to the question “how would you like it if someone did that to you?” I like my undergrad students to ponder the Spiderman principle of ethics: with great power comes great responsibility.

Whether or not basic communities ever did real damage to their local environments–even if they occasionally rendered them unlivable–they lacked the power to impact most species, much less entire ecosystems or the planet. Now that we do in fact possess that power, somehow we want to deny the Spiderman principle. Economic theory broadly, not just its capitalist instantiation, insists that responsibility be limited strictly to individuals and their negative impacts on individuals.

But in planetary terms, and also in moral terms I believe, we don’t get to get away with that, and I think the early Buddhist texts are a helpful reminder of that fact.

1 Like

Beautiful essay. Thank you, Bhante.

As I get older, I find myself more and more engaged with religious texts. The Suttas, of course, but also the Bible and many of the early Christian writers like the dessert fathers and mothers.

There is an idea in St. Augustine that our issue is disordered love. Not that we love the wrong things, necessarily, but that we love the right things in the wrong order. We too often put work before family, a new possession before hanging out with friends, being on our phone rather than being present to our family.

In this view there is nothing inherently wrong with wanting to be secure and safe and have a nice home. But when that love of safety and having a nice home becomes more important to us than the planet, our community, our connection with others, our spiritual life - that’s the problem.

And of course, it matters that you put ordered loves into practice - that you act in a way that loves the planet and your community more than your stuff.

Personally, I doubt Buddhist thought (unsatisfactoriness, no self) will speak to the modern world. It is just too big a jump from where the world is, and it doesn’t sound inviting to the uninitiated.

I do think there is a lot in Buddhist practice that the modern world needs to listen to. The ability to live happily with less. To be thankful for what is given. To live intentionally, with loving kindness.

1 Like

I’d say the agricultural revolution and the start of civilisation is when we started to come out of sync. I think we see an understanding of this in many religious myths, including the Bible.

1 Like

I’m reminded of Tolkien. The more we try to control things, to bend them to our will the more we come out of sync with nature. Things start to become disrupted, to fall apart and become corrupted. This is why Sauron and Saruman’s realms are heavily industrial.

Of course that is literary exaggeration. Whilst there is a need to control within all of our scientific progress there is also the very human quality of curiosity and of wanting to make things better and to heal and so on. Technology has put us at odds with nature, but its greed and other defilements which adds massive fuel to the fire. Hopefully we can reach a point where we can use our technology to heal that rift. I think that would require not only developing better technology, but also developing the moral character of our species. Less materialism and short sightedness would be a start, and less science deniers and conspiracy theorists too.

1 Like

The socialist countries that were aiming for Communism, trying to get past Capitalism, also destroyed the environment, polluted and fought wars. Of course there are other anti-capitalist trends, like Anarcho-primitivism or some other Anarchism but I don’t see any of them as being workable.

It’s not the economic system that’s the issue.

May I suggest 2 wonderful books? Please see Paul S. Martin’s “Twilight of the Mammoths,” and Baz Edmeades’ “Megafauna: First Victims of the Human-Caused Extinction.”

The Agricultural Revolution only served to greatly accelerate our species’ already longstanding extreme impact upon Earth’s biome.