Share the love 🌞, tell Bhante Sujato everything about his mistakes, typos, and moments of forgetfulness and regret

Usually, feelings arise “dependent on” the respective sense contact; but in SN35.29:1.13, “the painful, pleasant, or neutral feeling that arises conditioned by mind contact is also overcome”.

Similarly at SN35.52:1.4 and 1.9, as well as at SN35.167:1.14.

2 Likes

It’s not a hard deadline, just make sure the work is where you want it to be. :folded_hands:

fixed, thanks.

1 Like

DN 3:2.10.13
«you are neither seer nor someone on the path to becoming a seer.»

I think it should be «neither a seer».


DN 19:59.5 note
«uses ”path”»

Begins with a closing quotation mark.

«only led to rebirth is a high realm»

Probably «in» instead.


DN 23:23.15
«From such-and-such country.»

DN 23:23.41
«From such-and-such a country.»

Maybe remove «a» in DN 23:23.41.


DN 26:1.13 and DN 26:27.7
«That’s how a mendicant lives as with themselves»

Remove «as».


DN 27:9.4 note
«“bosom daughters” (Thig 3.3:2.3, Thig 13.4:25.2.»

I think there should be a closing parenthesis before the period.


MN 95:8.4 note
«family lineage.|»

Add space after the period.


DN 22:3.4 and MN 10:5.2
«observing ,»

MN 12:2.5 note
«DN 24:1.4.14 ,»

SN 19.10:1.6 note
«a “village head” ,»

Space before comma.


MN 91:26.29
«convience»

Should be «convenience».


MN 93:18.5
«Only brahmins are the Divinity’s true-born sons»

MN 93:5.7, :5.14, :18.43
«Only brahmins are the Divinity’s bosom sons»

I think MN 93:18.5 should match the others.


MN 99:19.4
«“We shall participate in the big sacrifice of the brahmin named so-and-so.”»

SN 12.15:2.5
«thought, “my self”,»

Change to single quotation marks.


SN 22.79:11.19
«inferior or superior; near or far:»

«far or near:» are used in equivalent segments.


SN 22.87:1.2 note
«normally “house’»

Closing quotation mark should be double.


AN 4.24:0.3
«At Kāិaka’s monastery»

Capitalize «monastery» since it’s in the title.


AN 5.23:2.6
«Your extend your mind»

Begin with «You».


AN 5.76:19.2
«he know he’s freed»

Probably «knows» instead.


AN 5.143:4.3 and AN 5.166:13.6,
«, wher. He sat down»

I think «, wher» should be removed.


AN 8.24:2.1, AN 10.93:16.2, AN 10.94:13.1, DN 16:4.36.2, and Ud 5.3:7.1
«leaviing»

Should be «leaving».


AN 10.177:5.1
«Take someone else who doesn’t kill living creatures, steal, commit sexual misconduct, or use speech that’s false, divisive, harsh, or nonsensical. They're contented, kind-hearted, with right view.»

«They’re» has a straight apostrophe.

AN 10.177:14.1
«Take someone else who doesn’t kill living creatures, steal, or commit sexual misconduct. They don’t use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re contented, kind-hearted, with right view.»

I think this should be translated the same as AN 10.177:5.1.

AN 10.177:3.2 and AN 10.177:10.3
«(Brahmin,) take someone who kills living creatures, steals, and commits sexual misconduct. They use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re covetous, malicious, with wrong view.

These two were similar to AN 10.177:14.1 in that they used three sentences instead of two, and they started the last sentence with «And» which AN 10.177:5.1 didn’t.

3 Likes

Notwithstanding, the enormous size of your work stands as a beacon of tenacity; and the size of these threads an inspiration for humility, bhante. :sweat_smile: :folded_hands:

6 Likes

AN5.3:2.1 When a mendicant has five qualities they live happily in this very life—without distress, distress, or fever—and when the body breaks up, after death, they can expect a good rebirth.

Double distress?

4 Likes

MN 102 minor typo, one “s” too many on a “feeling”. :slight_smile:

22.7 When neutral feeling ceases, pleasure not of the flesh arises; and when pleasure not of the flesh ceases, neutral feelings arises.

2 Likes

If this is a thread for correcting your grammar and spelling, I’m in the wrong place, but I’ve been dying to ask.

In your translation of the first concentration, from MN 119 (for example):

Furthermore, a mendicant, quite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskillful qualities, enters and remains in the first absorption, which has the rapture and bliss born of seclusion, while placing the mind and keeping it connected.

How did you arrive at “placing the mind and keeping it connected”? I don’t read Pali, unfortunately, but I have noticed that other translations make reference to qualities of thought, as in “directed and sustained”, “applied and sustained”, “initial and sustained”.

Mencius’s “released mind”, mind let go of, has a place, but I think “contiguous” is better than connected, and both these attributes concern “one-pointedness of mind” which is synonymous with “right concentration”, not something belonging only to the first concentration as your translation would have it.

My opinion, but I’m curious about how you read the Pali, to arrive at “placing the mind and keeping it connected”?

Indeed. Incidentally, using “bosom” for orasa allows me to disambiguate from atraja, which is “true-born”.

Actually other way around. Generally for this passage, divide the items in sentences 3/4/3, unless diction dictates otherwise.

Thanks for all these, I have corrected them.

OMG :blush:

It somehow feels linguistically inaccurate but psychologically precise.

Thanks!

A long and tedious process of trial, frustration, and inspiration that was quickly dashed. You see, it all began when I started to learn the saxophone 


But seriously (although the saxophone part is in fact true), best look at the notes on MN 117 and MN 19.

3 Likes

MN 19 does have your explanation in the notes:

The first absorption still has vitakka, which above was rendered “thought” since it was clearly a verbal process. Jhāna is, however, a state of “higher mind” where all mental processes are elevated. Pleasure is no longer the coarse stimulus of the senses, seclusion is no longer just being physically isolated, rapture is no longer exciting. And vitakka is no longer the activity of verbalizing thought, as the burden of the sutta is to show that even wholesome thought prevents absorption. Rather, it is explained as a subtle process of placing the mind and keeping it in place (as defined at MN 117:14.2). The English word “thought” in the sense “to bring something to mind” might be elastic enough to cover this sense, but it is apt to be misleading. | The late canonical Peáč­akopadesa has an interesting analysis that precedes the commentarial Theravadin understanding of this point (Pe 7).

So thanks for that.

Checking PE 7 “Pakiáč‡áč‡akaniddesa”, as translated by Bhikkyu Bodhi–here I think are the critical passages, in the discussion of the first concentration:

583. Thinking is like a text-reciter who does his recital silently: exploring is like his simply contemplating it. Thinking is like non-diagnosis; exploring is like diagnosis. Thinking is the Discrimination of Language and the Discrimination of Perspicuity; exploring is the Discrimination of Ideas and the Discrimination of Meanings. Thinking is cognizance’s skill in health; exploring is cognizance’s skill in directive-guidance. Thinking is about this being profitable, this unprofitable, about this to be kept in being, this to be abandoned, this to be verified; exploring is like the abandoning, the keeping in being, the verifying.

584. The twofold, bodily and mental, pain does not arise in one steadied in these types of (a) thinking and (b) exploring, and the twofold pleasure, bodily and mental, does arise. The mental pleasure thus sprung from thinking is (c) happiness, while (d) the bodily pleasure is bodily feeling (?). The (e) unification here is concentration. That is how the first meditation has abandoned five factors and possesses five factors.

I do see that you carried “unification” into your translation of MN 117:

And what is noble right immersion with its vital conditions and its prerequisites? They are: right view, right purpose, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, and right mindfulness. Unification of mind with these seven factors as prerequisites is called noble right immersion ‘with its vital conditions’ and also ‘with its prerequisites’.

The unification referred to appears to be:

The mental pleasure thus sprung from thinking is (c) happiness, while (d) the bodily pleasure is bodily feeling (?). The (e) unification here is concentration.

Meanwhile, Horner for the Pali Text Society has the passage about “right concentration” in MN 117 as:

And what, monks, is the ariyan right concentration, with the causal associations, with the accompaniments?

It is right view, right purpose, right speech, right action, right mode of livelihood, right endeavour, right mindfulness. Whatever one-pointedness of mind, monks, is accompanied by these seven components, this, monks, is called the ariyan right concentration with the causal associations and the accompaniments.

And Horner’s MN 119 first concentration is:

And again, monks, a monk, aloof from pleasures of the senses, loof from unskilled states of mind, enters on and abides in the first meditation which is accompanied by initial thought and discursive thought, is born of aloofness, and is rapturous and joyful. He drenches, saturates, permeates, suffuses this very body with the rapture and joy that are born of aloofness; there is no part of his whole body that is not suffused with the rapture and joy that are born of aloofness.

Monks, as a skilled bath-attendant or his apprentice, having sprinkled bath-powder into a bronze vessel, might knead it while repeatedly sprinkling it with water until the ball of lather had taken up moisture, was drenched with moisture, suffused with moisture inside and out, but without any oozing.

Even so, monks, does a monk drench, saturate, permeate, suffuse this very body with the rapture and joy that are born of aloofness; there is no part of his whole body that is not suffused with the rapture and joy that are born of aloofness.

While he is thus diligent, ardent, self-resolute, those memories and aspirations that are worldly
are got rid of; by getting rid of them the mind itself is inwardly settled, calmed, focussed, concentrated.

Thus too, monks, does a monk develop mindfulness of body.

Zest and ease, as PTS Woodward would have it, are unified in the “bath-ball”, but there is a “one-pointedness” that is the bath-ball. It is “placing the mind and keeping it in place”, in the sense that Cheng Man Ch’ing referred to the mind and ch’i together at the tan t’ien even as ch’i is mobilized throughout the body. From something I’m writing:

If those who learn T’ai Chi Ch’uan do not know what Mencius meant by “Seek the released mind,” they will find that their cultivation of ch’i is meaningless and simply tiresome. The Classics say that the mind and ch’i stay together in the tan t’ien. This is the “seeking of the released mind” to arrive at the perfect place of cultivation without harm.

(“Cheng Tzu’s Thirteen Treatises on T’ai Chi Ch’uan”, Cheng Man Ch’ing, tr. Benjamin Pang Jeng Lo and Martin Inn, p 59)

With regard to the mobilization of ch’i, Cheng quoted the Classics:

The Classics say, “The mind mobilizes the ch’i and the ch’i mobilizes the body. The ch’i spreads throughout the whole body.”

(ibid p 32; emphasis added)

In Cheng’s teaching, the “released mind” and the ch’i stay together in the tan t’ien, yet the mobilized ch’i is spread throughout the body. In Gautama the Buddha’s teaching, a person “lays hold of one-pointedness” of mind and gathers feelings of zest and ease in that “one-pointedness”, yet the feelings of zest and ease are simultaneously extended throughout the body.

That is concentration, as a function of mind as a one-pointed place and the contiguity of the instances of mind through the extension of a feeling throughout the body and the gathering of that feeling as the one-pointed place.

I wish you the best with the saxophone, hope you’re still playing!

(edited for clarity 8/12/2026)

In the note at SN 22.90:1.3, there are a couple of mistakes

These events follow the Buddha’s passing, where he asked the Saáčgha to not advise Channa or instruct him (DN 16:6.4.1. Channa features often in the Vinaya as a monk who refuses correction and acts disrespectfully. The Saáč…gha had already imposed an act of “ejection” (ukkhepanÄ«yakamma) on him due to his persistent bad behavior, but that was still not enough (Kd 1:25.1.1). The brahmadaáč‡áža was imposed at the First Council (Kd 1:1.12.1), upon which Channa finally saw the error of his ways.

  1. Saáčgha and Saáč…gha are both found in the same note, while both refers to the monastic order, the inconsistent spelling is not ideal.
  2. There is a missing closing bracket ) for the reference to DN 16.
2 Likes

Thanks, that’s fixed now.

2 Likes