I’ve never really liked that aspect of Tibetan Buddhism: the idea that one must attach oneself to a lineage in which some special spiritual power, or secret sauce, is “transmitted” mind-to-mind down through the lineage holders. It reminds me of theories like the divine right of kings , and other kinds of superstitious and magical thinking. Who’s to say who is enlightened and who isn’t? I don’t believe some master can literally look into the mind of a student and verify the presence of enlightenment, and so grant the official lineage seal of enlightenment approval. Nobody can know for sure how another mind perceives the world. What you are likely to get in this kind of culture is a bunch of people who have mastered the art of “acting enlightened” in order to project a certain impressive aura. I guess it also gets you plenty of worshipful novices bustling around with eager-to-please “guru devotion”, and that’s one way to make sure the annoying chores get done.
I am sure that this kind of magical aura can make some people feel very devoted, and maybe that makes them strive hard. But this kind of attitude also opens one up to quacks, charlatans, rogues and just dangerously abusive personalities on a power trip. And as long as the student thinks they have to wait around to “get” something from the master, and won’t make real progress until the master deigns to transmit the special sauce with a “meeting of the minds”, it seems more like a cultish technique of psychological enslavement than a healthy teaching environment.
I think the Buddha was pretty clear about the fact that he taught a practice or technique, and that he was incapable of releasing anybody. Once you learn the technique, there is nothing else to do but to refrain from worldly pursuits and from getting caught up in passions and sensual pleasure, and then sit there, observe the suffering in your own fathom-long body, work out from your own experience what mental factors seems to be causing it, and strive to bring an end to the operation of those mental factors by letting go.
Dhotaka:
I see in the world of beings
divine & human,
a brahman who lives
possessing nothing.
I pay homage to him,
the All-around Eye.
From my perplexities, Sakyan, release me!
The Buddha:
No one in the world, Dhotaka,
can I release from perplexity.
But knowing the most excellent Dhamma,
you will cross over this flood.
Dhotaka:
Teach with compassion, brahman,
the Dhamma of seclusion
so that I may know—
so that I, unafflicted as space,
may go about right here,
independent,
at peace.
The Buddha:
I will expound to you peace
—here-&-now,
not quoted words—
knowing which, living mindfully,
you’ll go beyond
entanglement in the world.
Dhotaka:
And I relish, Great Seer,
that peace supreme,
knowing which, living mindfully,
I’ll go beyond
entanglement in the world.
The Buddha:
Whatever you’re alert to,
above, below,
across, in between:
Knowing it as a bond in the world,
don’t create craving
for becoming or non-becoming.
Sutta Nipata 5.5.