Our friend @jayarava has just published the third and final instalment of his essay entitled ‘The True History of the Heart Sutra’, which I found very interesting and out of the box.
In an nutshell, @jayarava concludes that the received tradition of the history of the Heart Sutra is bunk. It was probably forged by a Chinese author, and the work was really well done!
Despite that, Jayarava notes that the practical implications and motivations of the Heart Sutra are legitimate to some extent:
"The practice of nonapprehension (anupalambha-yoga) of dharmas is central to the Prajñāpāramitā.
Just such a practice of withdrawing attention from sense experience is outlined in the Majjhima-Nikāya (MN 121) and so this material is relevant for early Buddhism enthusiasts as well.By withdrawing attention from sense experience, using meditative techniques, we can bring sense experience to a halt without losing consciousness.
In the ensuing state, the processes which give rise to experience (i.e., the skandhas) are not apprehended.
Nor are the objects of the senses. This state feels like being in infinite space.
If we also withdraw attention from cognitive experience, then we cease to apprehend thoughts and it feels like infinite consciousness.
Through several more refinements that are more difficult to explain, one ends up in the state of emptiness in which there is only a kind of base awareness; one is conscious, but not of anything.
Subject and object do not arise. Self does not arise. No dharmas arise in this state.
And this is what the Heart Sutra is describing.
(…)
Fundamentally, Buddhism asks us to orient ourselves away from the kamaloka, to turn away from sense experience as a means to life satisfaction.
The Heart Sutra draws mainly on a tradition of attempts to communicate from the ārupaloka.
This is not some metaphysical absolute.
It is not a paramārtha-satya or ultimate truth. Emptiness is not some alternative reality.
It is experiential, though perhaps not in any way that someone intoxicated with sense experience can appreciate.In conclusion, then, the Heart Sutra is not what we were told it is, but it is exactly what we wish it to be.
It is not an Indian, Sanskrit text.
It is not a genuine sutra. It is a patchwork of pericopes, stitched together by a 7th Century Chinese monk.
However, it does contain an accurate depiction of what we often call the farther shore, the cessation of sensory experience and cognitive experience that results in the radical reorganisation of our psyche away from self-centredness."
I hope you enjoy as much as I did reading his interesting analysis!