Three marks of moha

Q & A
1

Lobha: nicca, sukkha, attā

Dosa: nicca, dukkha, attā

Moha: nicca, na sukkha na dukkha(neutral feeling or uppekha or equinimity), attā

Is the above methodology right or wrong?

Everywhere in the suttas, Moha = nicca, sukha, attā.

As moha = irrational attention to a neutral object

Then why in the suttas 2nd mark of existence as sukha, instead of neut

ral one?

2

Yes it is. Simple logic dictates that if lobha, moha, etc were nicca, there would be no escape.

A better approach would be to read some basic intro texts or take an Intro course in the basics of Buddhism through this: https://buddhistuniversity.net/

:folded_hands:

3

Sorry, but real meaning here => not the permanence of moha, but instead the distortion of perception in moha for one with a lack of wisdom, i.e., an asuttva putthujana.
Three marks of existence:
Anicca, dukkha and anattā.