Hello, I am a student working on a project involved with understanding Buddhist ethics regarding medicine, influences and meditation, including influences like tea and alcohol as a way to understand what is ‘allowed’ in terms of tools for practice.
my questions (in the title) is; Is meditative experience with external influences like tea, coffee, or medicine authentic?
I am interested in skillful means. although the culminative goal of practice may form as an inner realization, often, the forces adapted in teaching are external. This is where I am most interested; I aim to analyze, according to Buddhist ethics, what is considered skillful in the use of external supports in meditative practice.
I have interviewed many monastics and many Buddhist lay people in Vietnam and people who practice a style of everyday [plumb village style] mindfulness. I am just generally interested though in the ethics behind ‘supports’ and ‘tools’ for practice of meditation.
i have so far reviewed tea and intoxicants and have come to the following list of judgements for when something is possibly deemed acceptable;
medicine, supports etc. is acceptable when used with 1) good ethical intention (karma), 2) in support for avoiding unsupportive mental states (right mindfulness), 3) only used when needed (the middle way), and lastly 4) is given up when no longer needed (renunciation) ← at the highest level of practice…
if anyone has any interesting thoughts on this topic I would love to hear from you, I dont require any more formal interviews, although if you wish I can cite you for this project (although I wont publish and don’t plan to publish this project)
I am sure I am making some ignorant oversimplifications or looking past some obvious logic so generally I would love just to witness an interesting discourse.
thank you