What transmigrates from life to life? What is it that goes from one life to the next?
The Buddhaās answer in the early Pali Canon refuses both obvious options. To say that a self (attÄ) transmigrates would be eternalism (sassatavÄda); to say nothing continues would be annihilationism (ucchedavÄda). He rejects both as micchÄ diį¹į¹hi - wrong view. The MahÄtaį¹hÄsankhaya Sutta (MN 38) is particularly direct: when the monk SÄti claims the Buddha taught that āthis same consciousness transmigrates,ā the Buddha sharply corrects him, insisting that viƱƱÄį¹a always arises dependently and never travels as a free-standing entity.
What the Canon points toward instead is causal continuity without a continuing self - not a thing that transmigrates but a process: the momentum of kamma and taį¹hÄ conditioning a new arising through paį¹icca-samuppÄda. A being cannot be said to truly exist as a substantial, persisting entity, nor can it be said to simply not exist - it is dependently arisen, which places it beyond both designations. The Sutta that describes this nicely is the KaccÄnagotta Sutta (SN 12.15). The operative question the Buddha consistently redirects toward is not what transmigrates, but what sustains the process - and that is craving. Uproot craving, and the question dissolves along with the conditions that make rebirth possible.
Thereās a
Search feature at the top of every page so you can look for previous threads about a given topic, such as
and so on
This is probably the best answer Iāve read so far to this question - and Iāve been looking, thanks!
āā¦not a thing that transmigrates but a processā is great. It makes me realize that I need to know more about dependent origination.
Thank you! I did search but must have not used the right terms. Those different threads come up with different answers. Whatās your answer? Dependent origination just continues?
I would need more context on what your actual question is, but to be brief Iād say ākarma.ā Itās your actions that live on after you die.
The context is⦠someone dies and then is reborn. What is it, or what process is it, that passes/goes from life to life / death to birth?
Based on my research, there appear to be a few candidates:
-
mindstream (citta-santÄna)
-
stream of consciousness (viƱƱÄį¹asotaį¹)
-
dependent origination just continues doing its thing
-
karma
It sounds like youāre asking about the metaphysics of it? Like the mechanism by which karma operates across lifetimes?
Perhaps, this quote from Milinda Panha will answer your question:
The king said: āWhat is it, NÄgasena, that is reborn?ā
āName-and-form is reborn.ā
āWhat, is it this same name-and-form that is reborn?ā
āNo: but by this name-and-form deeds are done, good or evil, and by these deeds (this Karma) another name-and-form is reborn.ā
āIf that be so, Sir, would not the new being be released from its evil Karma ?ā
The Elder replied: āYes, if it were not reborn. But just because it is reborn, O king, it is therefore not released from its evil Karma.ā
āGive me an illustration.ā
āSuppose, O king, some man were to steal a mango from another man, and the owner of the mango were to seize him and bring him before the king, and charge him with the crime. And the thief were to say: āYour Majesty! I have not taken away this manās mangoes. Those that he put in the ground are different from the ones I took. I do not deserve to be punished.ā How then? would he be guilty?ā
āCertainly, Sir. He would deserve to be punished.ā
āBut on what ground?ā
āBecause, in spite of whatever he may say, he would be guilty in respect of the last mango which resulted from the first one (the owner set in the ground).ā
āJust so, great king, deeds good or evil are done by this name-and-form and another is reborn. But that other is not thereby released from its deeds (its Karma).ā
What is it that ātransmigratesā in this very life? Itās the same thing that transmigrates from one life to the next.
Between being a baby and being an adult there is no being or essence or whatnot that persists through, but neither is the baby one and the adult another. Rather there is a casual continuity, a process, over time. The same with rebirth across lives.
Iām just asking what āthingā or what process continues from the moment of death to the moment of birth.
What passes from one life to the next?
Excellent! Superb!
Thank you for finding an answer in a text that is as clear as day - Name and Form are reborn. Do you know of any Nikaya sources?
Iām not sure what ātransmigratesā in this very lifeā¦ignorance? Or dependent origination more broadly?
The way I understand it more fully is covered in AN3.76 and AN3.77.
As Peaceful D said, the bottom line is craving. Because craving generates intentional action, kamma is generated and kamma ripens. I like Bhikkhu Bodhiās explanation (spoken here and transcribed, not written):
āConsciousness is not conceived as a single entity like a self or a soul, but consciousness is an ever-changing process, an ever-changing flux of states of consciousness. But according to the Buddha there is a continuity of consciousness, so that the consciousness in a sense moves on from one state to another, and itās like consciousness is compared to a seed. So we could say that the consciousness of the previous existence is like a plant that has brought forth the seed and when that plant comes to an end and dies but the seed drops into the soil and springs up again, bringing into being another type of existence, another sentient being that inherits that stream of consciousness from the past life the past existence. and what keeps this process moving, what keeps living beings moving on roaming from life to life is ignorance and craving.ā
It might help to reframe ātransmigratesā into ātransforms.ā
In direct experience, arenāt there ever-changing processes that are transforming? Feeling-tone processes felt like this, now they feel like that; thought-processes were like this, now theyāre like thatā¦
Thereās no wizard behind the curtain. Transforming conditions need no inherent āanythingā to transform and change, as in DN15.
So in this sense, death is just a more āradicalā transformation of conditions/processes that combine into new combinations of processes called rebirth, etc.
Until this stops, conditions just roll on and on. Meaning dukkha is perpetuated.
The Buddha taught that the processes of ignorance and craving , influencing conditions called choices/kamma, are the fuels that perpetuate this now , during, and after the transformation called bodily death, as in SN56.11 and many other suttas.
But why ask about āwhatā and not about āwhoā. Itās much easier to answer who transmigrates from life to life from suttas.
Wouldnāt the answer be that there is transmigration but there isnāt a who?
Agree. If āwhoā refers to some unchanging essence thereās nothing like that in DO or the 4NTs.
I heard Ahjahn @Brahmali once asked in a Q&A whether everyone eventually reaches enlightenment to which he answered āNoā. (Tagging him here solely in case I have misheard, misremembered or in any way am misrepresenting his view) Assuming that I am recalling correctly, thenā¦
ā¦sounds to me like the process continues eternally. Am I correctly understanding Buddhist doctrine to be that thereās no eternal self, but that there is an eternal process? (excepting enlightenment)
Even the āeternalistsā in DN1 effectively acknowledge that the self is changingā¦
And so they recollect their many kinds of past lives,