Not sure if it is in the Suttas. Did the Buddha believed that the Universe had no beginning and no end.
Was it an existing concept before the time of the Buddha?
Hi alaber,
Yes. Here are the corresponding suttas :
http://suttacentral.net/sn15.2
Btw itâs chapter one of book : In the Buddhaâs word by bikkhu Bodhi
Dear Alaber,
To be precise, the Buddha says the world has âno discoverable beginningâ. This is subtly but importantly different form saying it has no beginning. One is an empirical claim, the other metaphysical speculation.
With metta.
Dear Ajahn Brahmali,
Thanks for correcting and adding the important prefix âdiscoverableâ. But in passages of buddha remembering his past lives, he said, " I recollected my manifold past lives, that is, one birth, two births, three births, four births, five births, ten births, twenty births, thirty births, forty births, fifty births, a hundred births, a thousand births, a hundred thousand births, many aeons of world-contraction, many aeons of world-expansion, many aeons of world-contraction and expansion "
Expansion and contraction of world, sometimes confuses me, it sounds like Big Bang ? How does it fit in no discoverable beginning statement.
With metta,
Shivam.
Dear Shivam,
Well, the Buddha is saying that he knows this too as result of the recollection of past lives. So again, itâs really an empirical claim.
With metta.
Thanks for your response dear Ven.
With much gratitude and respect.
Shivam.
As for @alaberâs question, I would have to say Iâm not sure. The áčg Veda doesnât go into such cosmological issues all that much. There is, however, the famous passage of the Nasadiya Sukta:
This is clearly a precursor to the note of empirical caution which, as stated above by @Brahmali, the Buddha made explicit. Itâs perhaps less clear that it refers to a âlong cycleâ, as familiar in Buddha texts, but at least it is paving the way.
I havenât studied the UpaniáčŁads for this question, so couldnât say with any certainty. But generally they have a varied cosmology, and while they do have some creation myths that deal with a specific event, there is no reason these could no be subsumed within a larger cyclical cosmology.