Thanks so much, John, that is very helpful.
I had already done about half of PP before I started Warder, and I found it didn’t really help me understand the suttas. In fact, it gave me a false confidence that Pali grammar was very straightforward and logical, and I got very confused when the suttas contained constructions that I wasn’t familiar with.
I found after doing 12 lessons of Warder and a few lessons in G&K I am much more confident in tackling some of the suttas. I have just finished reading through the passages in Rune’s book that Bhante Sujato listed as a reading prerequisite and I found apart from a few really difficult sentences, I was able to parse the sentences (with the help of the accompanying vocabulary lists). So, kudos to Bhante Sujato for choosing Warder as the text book for this course, it has really helped me (despite it being quite dense and frustrating sometimes).
I chose those 3 examples precisely because I didn’t think they were covered in PP, that’s why I was very surprised when Gillian said I should be referencing PP.
PS: I really like your rationalisation of yena … tena - makes a lot of sense to me (although I think you have the agent and the patient reversed - it doesn’t help that both are nominative). I also tried to rationalise the genitive absolutive as “however, the body (of me that did work) becomes tired.” Thanks for giving those references to G&K for my examples - I will certainly look them up. I have also started reading the “Buddha’s Discourses in Pali” - you are right, this is an excellent book and the trilinear approach helps enormously.