Another way to know how one shouldn’t separate the basis for/of cessation from cessation is like
Buddha teaches two elements
The constructed
The uncontructed
But there is another way to convey this
Buddha teaches two elements
The dukhkha
The dukkhanirodha
The referents remain the same as the expression changes.
Therefore if one says ‘is there something else there other than dukkha and it’s cessation’?
No there is no such thing being taught.
But what about the ayatana where no world?
The buddha doesn’t teach like this
- both formerly & now i declare only dukkha, the cessation of dukkha and that ayatana where there is no world
I hope you see the difference as what i mean by divorcing the asankhata from sankhatanirodha after having delineated a difference between the two.
Gling back to the thought experiment. A dhamma teacher therein is teaching for the cessation of dream-perception based on the awakening to the 6 sense faculties of being awake. He could say
I declare only the dream and it’s cessation
He doesn’t have to proclaim that in dependence on which the cessation is discerned, as the waking state, explicitly, because the discernment of cessation of a dream is apprehended as perception of the waking state.
So in this particular sense the question ‘is there anything else after final awakening from the dream?’
Should be answered in a way that maintains that there is only dream & it’s cessation, and in this thought experiment cessation implies next world and so there is no need to state this explicitly.
Again,
The buddha doesn’t teach like this
- both formerly & now i declare only dukkha, the cessation of dukkha and that ayatana where there is no world
However many people of various persuation do understand it like this and ask if the ayatana is not what there is after cessation.
Going back to the thought expetiment. One dreaming, having heard that awakening is apprehended based on sensory discernment could misapprehend that teaching as being a declaration of a continuation of the dream world asking things like whether he will meet his friends from the dream after awakening.
On the other hand is it not inconceivable that someone might misapprehend the teaching in the dream for proclaiming that final awakening is like the atheist’s idea of death?
It’d be difficult to maintain this conviction after having heard descrptions of the waking state as being much like the dream state but if nobody explained then i think it is possible.
One like this also divorces cessation from that in dependence on what it occurs and asserts that one should talk about the end of the dream as one talks about seeing a fire be extinguished.
These are very subtle points making a huge difference and it’s entirely relevant to how one talks about one thing ceasing in dependence on another being discerned & apprehended.