Did the Buddha ever say there is a ”Law of Karma”?

[josephzizys]

Just to chime in and clarify, actions snd thier consequences (“kamma”) is analysed by the buddha exactly the same way as actors (“beings”) are analysed by the buddha:

Actors, thier actions, and the consequences of thier actions cannot be:

Eternal
Not eternal
Both
Niether

But are

Conditional

This philosophy is most comprehensivly explained in DN1 and DN2 (and DN9) but is also used explicitly for kamma at SN12.17 and elsewhere, please see

TO BE OR NOT TO BE, the undeclared points in the 4 principle Nikayas:

TO BE OR NOT TO BE (or both, or neither) The undeclared points in the 4 principle Nikayas. The undeclared points are a number of questions, typically ten, but sometimes as few as two, as at SN44.10, and sometimes as many as 11, as at AN10.95, and often 4, as at SN12.17. This essay focuses on the standard set of ten, and looks at the differing explanations given for the Buddha’s silence in the different suttas. We first see the undeclared points introduced at DN1 and DN2, where they are used to…

For more examples.