Atthi imasmiṃ kāye –
Kesā lomā nakhā dantā taco (5)
Maṃsaṃ nhāru aṭṭhi aṭṭhimiñjaṃ vakkaṃ (5)
Hadayaṃ yakanaṃ kilomakaṃ pihakaṃ papphāsaṃ (5)
Antaṃ antaguṇaṃ udariyaṃ karīsaṃ matthaluṅgaṃ(5)
Pittaṃ semhaṃ pubbo lohitaṃ sedo medo (6)
Assu vasā kheḷo siṅghāṇikā lasikā muttanti(6).
(32 parts in total)
(Suttapiṭaka » Khuddakanikāya » Khuddakapāṭhapāḷi » Dvattiṃsākāro)
Apart from that Paṭisambhidāmagga and milindapañña also note about matthaluṅga as an object of kāyagatāsati.
Kesā abhiññeyyā; lomā abhiññeyyā… matthaluṅgaṃ abhiññeyyaṃ.
Head hair that which should be well understood, body hair that which should be well understood,… brain that which should be well understood.
(Suttapiṭaka » Khuddakanikāya » Paṭisambhidāmaggapāḷi » Mahāvaggo »
Sutamayañāṇaniddeso)
However main discourses on the repulsive does not note 32 parts. There are only 31 parts except the brain (matthaluṅga).
atthi imasmiṃ kāye:
kesā lomā nakhā dantā taco(5)
maṃsaṃ nhāru aṭṭhi aṭṭhimiñjaṃ vakkaṃ(5)
hadayaṃ yakanaṃ kilomakaṃ pihakaṃ papphāsaṃ(5)
*antaṃ antaguṇaṃ udariyaṃ karīsaṃ pittaṃ(5) *
*semhaṃ pubbo lohitaṃ sedo medo(5) *
assu vasā kheḷo siṅghāṇikā lasikā muttan’ti.(6)
(MN 119)
Any ideas how this part (matthaluṅga) is missing from main discourses and added (later ?) in some parts of the tepitaka?
This may be included under Maṃsaṃ?