Hi everyone,
P(1) ALL CONSCIOUSNESS IS IMPERMANENT, SUFFERING AND WITHOUT SELF.(Suffering <==> Consciousness)
P(2) Consciousness is caused and it’s causes can be rooted out completely.
P(3) When the sankharas cease vinnana ceases eventually.
P(4) In “Nibbāna with residue” there is still consciousness.
P(5) The most profound states of samādhi are states of consciousness.
P(6) A living Buddha/Arahant has consciousness.
C(1) Therefore “Nibbāna with residue” is impermanent and suffering too.
C(2) The most profound states of samādhi consciousness are suffering too.
C(3) The full ending/cessation of consciousness is the full ending of any suffering and is therefore more desirable
than the blisses of even the most profound states of samādhi consciousness and “Nibbana with residue”.
C(4) A living Buddha/Arahant is suffering too.
C(5) A consciousness free of of greed, hatred and
delusion is suffering too.
C(6) Only non-consciousness is permanent and free from suffering (Nibbana in the strict sense).
C(7) Consciousness can be ended completely.
I’d be thankful for any Quotes from the EBTs that contradict any/all of these 6 Premises!
(Or if you can show me that a conclusion doesn’t follow from these Ps)
Best,
Michael