I quite regularly think what would happen to religious leaders should they have lived in the modern world. I think Jesus would have a fairly high chance of ending up with a long-term jail sentence, Muhammad could also face certain difficulties given his military undertakings. The Buddha’s ministry would hardly be overshadowed by such harsh repercussions. However, he would be likely to face some rather severe social criticism, primarily in the media:
- His followers are required to live a renunciant life, forsaking their sexuality, gender-specific worldly modes of behaviour, as well as the large chunk of their personal property;
- The Buddha would have quite a cordial relationship with the economical and political establishment of his time, not rejecting even controversial figures and sometimes receiving costly gifts like monastery land or dwellings;
- The Sangha would in some opinions show unsatisfactory levels of concern with modern problems like climate change or humanitarian issues;
- Some of the imagery used by the Buddha in his preaching would be considered rather sinister and disturbing (contemplation of the body, etc.);
- The Buddha could be accused of breaking up families (cf. with the canonical story of him abandoning his own families),
- The Buddha would be accused of sexism (no matter how hard you try there can always be someone accusing you of sexism )
However, this may not only be typical of the modern time. One of Ven. Analayo’s essays addressed such a controversy regarding the Buddha’s public image. SN 42.9 may also represent another PR attack on the Buddha. My question is whether there is other Sutta evidence of social, non-doctrinal criticism of the Buddha during his lifetime?