Nibbana as a type of consciousness: how does Buddhism differ from Advaita Vedanta?

[knigarian]

@Nikolas

Therefore, the idea of ​​​​a constant, happy consciousness fundamentally contradicts the teachings of the Buddha.

Who says “happy” and that it “exist” or not “exist”?

You can comment here↓, this is not a topic for such discussions.

Viññana anidasana = escape from being

As we know from dependent arising mutual dependence of consciousness and name-&-matter is what constitute samsaric bondage, and so is determined by ignorance [I take conceit “I am” as core of ignorance: “as long as there is the attitude ‘I am’ there is organization of the five faculties of eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body.” SN 22:47]; of course conceit “I am” itself is dependently arisen: 'I am’ is derivative, not underivative. Derivative upon what? Derivative upon matter, feeling, perception, …