The Brahmins of Sāla (MN41) has consistently remained amongst my very favourite of the suttas although I’ve never been entirely sure why - it just makes me involuntarily glad.
Anyhow, this evening I came to read AN10.176, which is at core the same sutta, and spotted one detail I’d never really noticed before:
He speaks harshly; he utters such words as are rough, hard, hurtful to others, offensive to others, bordering on anger, unconducive to concentration. (MN41, Ven. Bodhi)
</>
He engages in abusive speech. He speaks words that are harsh, cutting, bitter to others, abusive of others, provoking anger and destroying concentration. (AN10.176, Ven. Thanissaro)
In this sutta, 10 unwholesome actions are described, but in all the other descriptions only what constitutes purity-defiling behaviour is outlined, no result is given (within these descriptive sections, naturally the Buddha later goes on to say hell, or an animal womb and so on is on the horizon for one engaged in improper conduct).
Then further, when the 10 mirroring wholesome actions are given, nothing is mentioned of concentration:
Abandoning harsh speech, he abstains from harsh speech; he speaks such words as are gentle, pleasing to the ear, and loveable, as go to the heart, are courteous, desired by many, and agreeable to many. (MN41, Ven. Bodhi)
</>
He speaks words that are soothing to the ear, that are affectionate, that go to the heart, that are polite, appealing & pleasing to people at large. (AN10.176, Ven. Thanissaro)
On casual examination, there thus seems to be two deviations from the given formula of these suttas (an anomalous inclusion of a consequence of poor behaviour and an inexact mirroring of wholesome / unwholesome properties) just to drive home how disruptive harsh speech is to the peacefulness of one’s mind.
Please feel free to correct, reflect or explain.