Dear forum
SN 12.20 states:
Paṭiccasamuppādañca vo, bhikkhave, desessāmi paṭiccasamuppanne ca dhamme. Taṃ suṇātha, sādhukaṃ manasi karotha, bhāsissāmī
At Savatthī. “Bhikkhus, I will teach you dependent origination and dependently arisen phenomena. Listen and attend closely, I will speak.”
SN 12.2 asks the question: “What is paṭiccasamuppādo?” and answers with the 12 conditions.
However other suttas, when describing lesser causal relationships, such as MN 38, where it discusses consciousness & the sense spheres or SN 36.9, which discusses vedana, use the term paṭiccasamuppanne, as follows:
Anekapariyāyena hi vo, bhikkhave, paṭiccasamuppannaṃ viññāṇaṃ vuttaṃ mayā, aññatra paccayā natthi viññāṇassa sambhavo
For in many ways I have stated consciousness to be dependently arisen, since without a condition there is no origination of consciousness.
Yaṃ yadeva, bhikkhave, paccayaṃ paṭicca uppajjati viññāṇaṃ, tena teneva viññāṇantveva saṅkhyaṃ gacchati
Bhikkhus, consciousness is reckoned by the particular condition dependent upon which it arises.
MN 38
“The three kinds of feelings, O monks, are impermanent, compounded, dependently arisen (paṭicca samuppannā), liable to destruction, to evanescence, to fading away, to cessation — namely, pleasant feeling, painful feeling, and neutral feeling.” SN 36.9
My question or inquiry is:
-
Does paṭiccasamuppāda refer exclusively to the 12 (or less) condition formula that results in dukkha?
-
If not, how do paṭiccasamuppāda vs paṭiccasamuppanne differ?
Thank you