Now Christmas is approaching and you might need something other than Covid-19 to discuss at the dinner table, I thought I’d post some of the findings I found during the course of the year but never got around to post.
Some time ago I came across an interesting evaluation of countries based on their Hofstede Masculinity Dimension. This Dimension focuses on the extent to which in a society ‘achievement’ or ‘nurture’ is given the most importance. Masculinity is seen to be the trait which emphasizes ambition, acquisition of wealth, and differentiated gender roles. Femininity is seen to be the trait which stress caring and nurturing behaviors, sexuality equality, environmental awareness, and more fluid gender roles.
Traits of Masculinity / Femininity
High Masculine | Low Masculine (Feminine) | |
social norms | ego oriented | relationship oriented |
money and things are important | quality of life and people are important | |
live in order to work | work in order to live | |
politics and economics | economic growth high priority | environment protection high priority |
conflict solved through force | conflict solved through negotiation | |
religion | most important in life | less important in life |
only men can be priests | both men and women as priests | |
work | larger gender wage gap | smaller gender wage gap |
fewer women in management | more women in management | |
preference for higher pay | preference for fewer working hours | |
family and school | traditional family structure | flexible family structure |
girls cry, boys don’t; boys fight, girls don’t | both boys and girls cry; neither fight | |
failing is a disaster | failing a minor accident |
So basically, this Hofstede Masculinity Dimension offers a measure of the patriarchy of societies, at least in a Western context.
Using the words “Masculine” and “Feminine” you might think of biological sex, but these traits have more to do with how we are raised in our society rather than our bodies. Many of us are told that men must be masculine and women must be feminine and from an early age we get projected onto us how we are to behave and how we are to be based on our biological sex. But these traits have nothing to do with our sex or gender.
Because “masculine” traits are valued more in a patriarchal society, both men and women learn from an early age that these traits are worthy of development while the “feminine” traits are suppressed.
Plotting the Hofstede Masculinity Dimension
Now I love making graphs of things and I’ve been thinking of how to make a graph of this Hofstede Masculinity Dimension. What struck me was the mention of Finland as a Feminine country. Finland is a bit unusual in several ways. The language does not stem from Sanskrit and therefore is not a gendered language. Moreover, Finland has the youngest female president in the world and it has been ranked as the happiest country in the world for several years running. So I decided to plot the data against the World Happiness Report 2020, which ranks 156 countries based on an average of three years of surveys between 2017 and 2019
The colors in the graph indicate groups of countries.
Blue = Scandinavian countries
Red = Western European countries
Orange = Eastern European countries
Green = Commonwealth countries
Dark green = Baltic countries
I only plotted western countries because I think the way people are raised in other cultures like in Asia might be different so this cannot be compared so easily.
What we see here is that the Scandinavian countries + the Netherlands are ranked as Feminine countries and rank as the happiest countries in the world. Moreover, these Feminine countries are far more open to LGBTIQA+ and there is more equality.
The notable exception here is Switzerland, but Switzerland (just like Belgium) is also made up of a number of distinctly different cultures and language-groups. Of course this counts also for the United States, where there are vast differences between states.
It seems that being a Feminine country is at least a large factor (but not the only one) that determines happiness level.
Examples
To give some examples of the differences between countries that rate as Feminine and Masculine, I quote from this website: Country comparison tool
Masculine
Feminine
I also feel this is a rather Buddhist way of going about things. What struck me about these descriptions, is that the approach to life and society in cultures with a more Feminine Dimension is in essense the same as what the Buddha prescribed for the Sangha, with a flat, non-hierarchal structure. Of course there is the respect for a teacher, but there is no leader in the Sangha; monastics make decisions based on consencus.
Of course there is a mutual respect but every member of the Sangha has a voice and has to be heard. This might make discussions sometimes a bit longer because not just one person makes the decisions; people discuss the issues until unanimity is reached.
I am not posting this to be complete in any way, but just to point to something that might be interesting for further research. “Leadership” is in essence a patriarchal concept. In feminist organisations there is no one person responsible for the succes of the group; it is team-work. I strongly feel that if countries are more Feminine, it will be better for everybody, including the environment. But of course, I’m biased coming from The Netherlands.