@yeshe.tenley this topic I have you in mind when I create it. You have learnt General relativity before right?
In general relativity, a simple solution of black hole equation, initially confused physicists for having 2 singularities. One at the centre of the black hole, another at the event horizon. It turns out that the event horizon one is an artifact of using a specific coordinate labelling to describe black holes. Using another coordinate system, the event horizon singularity disappeared and only the centre singularity remains.
Thus this illustrates how certain things we think actually exist are just an artifact of how we label the world. For example, labeling a company as Meta, or X, or SpaceX. To get to know the underlying reality which doesnât change due to re-labeling, one just tries another set of labeling (another coordinate system), and then see what remains the same and what doesnât.
Note here, the underlying reality can and do still change when the conditions changes. Itâs just that labelling conditions our perception of things, and that perception also affects how we interact with the things we label with.
Eg. I can label a wooden thing with 4 legs as a table. And I then use it to put computers on it, and books. Or I can choose to label it as a chair. Then I sit on it. Or a bed, then I sleep on it. The underlying object is still the same, despite the relabeling. Just that the function changes due to perception change by relabeling.
By not seeing these collections of buildings, staff, CEO, business model, financial flow as a company, the fictional story of a company breaks down and these individual components cannot function together anymore after some time.
By not seeing Bitcoin as money, it is worthless, but by seeing it as money, it drives people to use energy more efficiently, and try to find energy sources where itâs not economical to build a power plant, but economical to use it to mine bitcoin locally.
So too for these 5 aggregates, by not seeing it as a self, the new kamma cannot be created and they just run on old fuel until it dies.
I wonder how much of this would be considered as empty and how much as essential? Because in normal speech, one might consider the essential point of a black hole (as far as current GR goes) is the event horizon and central singularity which is unobservable, but still there in every coordinate system we use to describe it (I havenât tried every coordinate system, just a guess). Ok technically, a rotating black hole would have a ring singularity, a wormhole wouldnât have one, etc. But we label them differently.