Possibly Not th Buddha's Teaching

[Starter]

Possibly Not The Buddha’s teaching:
Minor, Other, Abhidhamma; Dhammapada,
MN 18, MN 120, MN 117, MN 135, MN 149,
DN 27, DN 29, DN 31,
AN3.80, AN 5.177, AN 8.54, AN 7.49, AN 9.36, AN 10.177, AN 10.29,
SN 6.1, SN 35.135, SN 56.46, sn56.47,
Maṅgala Sutta Kp 5

There are more errors in suttas than in Vinaya; Fewer errors in the suttas of my Sequence.

Errors: DN 10 (no rejoicing 17and equanimity), DN 21 [sense restraint section is helpful]

[Gabriel_L]

Hey @Starter , the idea of the “Discussion” category is to explore questions related to Early Buddhist Texts.
I think it would be helpful if you could expand a bit more your opening post, making as clear as possible the topic and focus of the discussion and dialogue you are interested in starting here.
Also, as always, have a look at the link below to understand what is expected of you when participating in this virtual space:

Universal Rules of Dhamma Discourse

This is a friendly place for Dhamma discussion Participating in this forum should be taken as an opportunity to practice Right Speech. As such, please show the forum and your fellow practitioners the same respect shown in a temple. We, too, are a community spiritual center — a space to share Dhamma ideas, understandings and questions in a supportive atmosphere. We are delighted to have you participate in this forum, but if you choose to do so please note that we will understand your participat…

[Starter]

I think I may have made a mistake in posting it. The discussions might help clarify whether or not they are the Buddha’s teaching. Sorry for the possible confusion.

Metta to all,

Starter