This thread is IMO a fairly healthy conversation that probably needed to be had (the other recent thread had seemed to me to have gotten a bit too “meta” and away from discussing the core points before it was closed).
I’m not on any particular side, given that I consider myself an agnostic (albeit one with a serious spiritual practice). At this point I don’t feel I can call myself a Buddhist (though I’ve no issues with how people use this label) because I’m agnostic (but open-minded) about some key doctrinal points like rebirth. I might stretch to using “Buddhist” as an adjective, i.e. as in “Buddhist agnostic”, but I’d not be comfortable using it as a noun, i.e. as in “agnostic Buddhist”. I’ve been deeply impressed by the EBTs. The Buddha was surely one of humanity’s great thinkers/philosophers, but that has not been enough in itself convince me that he was necessarily right about everything.
I can definitely respect the argument made by Ajahn Brahmali in the OP. There’s a lot to be said for clearly and respectfully setting out one’s stall and calling a spade a spade (even if some others may think it’s a lawnmower! 
). The Buddha did give prominence of place to rebirth (no doubt for good reasons). It can’t be a surprise if a prominent and long-standing monk working with the EBTs is passionately arguing for an approach taking the EBTs pretty much at face value!
However, I also identify a lot with, let’s say, the more philosophical wings of this argument (represented by people like DKervick). It’s quite possible I may continue not have any solid belief in rebirth and some other doctrinal issues until/if I get to the stage of the path where I can see them directly myself. I’d hope that solid faith in rebirth is not a prerequisite. DKervick does make the valid point that the Buddha didn’t see the reality of rebirth until his enlightenment under the Bodhi tree. Of course, Ajahn Brahmali makes the counter-point that the Buddha was an exceptional individual who may not have needed faith (that is as it may be, but I can’t manufacture faith to order! ).
Either way, regardless of the reality of rebirth, I hope following the steps of the path leads me to increasing freedom from suffering (the same direction both the author of the OP and DKervick are heading, it seems to me, despite the somewhat different enveloping contextual frameworks of both). Of course, arguments can certainly be had over which doctrinal/belief framework is better/more useful, which I’m sure this thread will argue over!
I think that for rebirth, in the sense as described by the Buddha, to exist, some kind of non-physical non-material component to the universe is necessary. I have a science background myself. I don’t see any plausible mechanisms within the framework of our current scientific understanding for this (even via the usual appeals to some kind of vague fuzzy quantum theory “magic”). Certainly not the fine-grained availability of past-life memories. IMO something more is needed, some kind of psychical dimension to the universe.
The fruits of para-psychological field over many decades are far from impressive or convincing, e.g. continual arguments up to the present day over Ganzfeld experiments and like (sensory leakage, methodology, reproducibility etc. etc.). You’d think the field would have been able to come up with something better by now. That’s, unsurprisingly, enough to convince many that such phenomenon probably don’t exist. I remain more open-minded than that. I’ve had some “spooky” personal experiences over the years and heard allegorical accounts from family members and friends to give me pause for thought. A certain amount of that is to be expected either way, but IMO it’s at a level that makes me wonder (I acknowledge this is going to convince no one! ).
There are, though, more general public accounts of this nature, e.g. the accounts of iddhis that are supposed to have been developed and exhibited by Dipa Ma (something she herself didn’t deny, e.g. in the interview transcript here). Again, allegorical, but there seem to have been quite a lot of witness to these powers (in living memory also with many still alive). It’s understandable if some people opt to be convinced by such accounts. I’m not fully convinced, but such things put me in a place where I don’t rule such things out.
I think there’s plenty room for various approaches and beliefs. That’s going to be inevitable if Buddhism takes solid root in the West. Anyway, I liked the robust and passionate argument made in the OP (even if at this point I have yet to gain faith in rebirth and some related doctrines).
.
, a seed of right view has already planted in your consciousness and will be blossomed in your next life as a “believer in rebirth”. 
onto this forum (not really the place I think), but I’ve made an exception here to give a little context.
