Nibbana is called the peak of peace (MN143)
I believe this peak of peace is not like a building that one has to construct over time.
The only way to arrive there (by way of speech) is to end all this usual constructing and building up activity in the mind.
The wordly Path is always about building up -activity. One wants to build up a certain state of mind, make it happen, have this, have that. The Noble Path is very different, i believe.
This was said by the Blessed One, said by the Arahant, so I have heard
Monks, this body falls apart; consciousness is subject to fading; all acquisitions are
inconstant, stressful, subject to change.
knowing the body as falling apart,
consciousness as dissolving away,
sseeing the danger in acquisitions,
youâve gone beyond
birth and death. (iti77, Thanissaro)
I believe, gone beyond, refers here to peace. Peace is no aquisition.
If all tendencies of possessiveness end, the natural result is the peak of peace of Nibbana.
No acquisitions. One does not make anything ones own. Also not peace.
That is a natural state of peace.
Having reached the foremost peace,
you bide your time,
composed. (Iti77)
What is said about this peace?
Such a Bhikkhu who has turned away from desire and attachment, and is possessed of understanding in this world, has (already) gone to the immortal peace, the unchangeable state of Nibbâna. (Snp1.11, Fausboll)
I think it is valid to say that the peace of Nibbana is not some aquistion or some build-up state.
Jhana is like a building but the peace of Nibbana is not like a building.
It is the unconstructed peak of peace. It is not that if one removes defilements this peak of peace of Nibbana is constructed. No it is the natural result of it. The supreme noble peace, the pacification of lust, hate, and delusion. (MN140)
It is not that one constructs gold or water when one purifies it. One also does not construct peace when defilements are removed.
I feel there is no need to conceive the peace of Nibbana as âsomethingâ or as ânothingâ, or as âsubstantialâ or ânot-substantialâ or even as eternal. This is not really relevant for practice, i believe.
Relevant, i feel, is seeing that there is an unmade, a not build up.
Seeing the difference between building up and not building up.
The avijja and tanha driven mind is always occupied in building up, in constructing, producing, making, want to have, possess. But what is build up, will always disintegrate. And Buddha does teach the Path to what is stable, constant and does not desintegrate (SN43)
Building up and constructing, aquisition is not the Path to end suffering⌠Because all that arises due to building up, will also desintegrate. How can that protect, provide safety? How can that be a refuge?
But the peace of Nibbana cannot be possessed. It can never be an aquisition. I believe this is what it really means when detachment is realised. To be enlightend.