@HongDa It appears D
/DN
is still not working. I tested on production and staging.
It may be that some volpages do not exists.
I have improved the related code and adjusted the search result page.
https://suttacentral.net/search?query=volpage:DN%20ii%2055
Currently, if the relevant volpage cannot be found, it will no longer be a blank page.
Hey @HongDa. I have just started another PTS heavy project and I just wanted to say a BIG THANK-YOU for all the awesome work youāve done on this. So far it is working exactly how I would want it to work! Yaayyyyy!
Hi again. So it might be a data thing or a misunderstanding on my part, but I was hoping to get a result from volpage: Ja.VI,378
and that it would get me to here:
Ja 542: Umaį¹
gajÄtakaāE.B. Cowell, W.H.D. Rouse (suttacentral.net)
Also wondering if the volpage search is or could be made available for Vinaya? For example: volpage: Vin.I,83
would get me to: Kd 1: MahÄkhandhakaāBhikkhu Brahmali (suttacentral.net)
Many many thanks
Thanks for pointing this out. In the mean time, this version of the lookup tool gives Vin
references.
I believe @HongDa may be away from his computer for a few days, so if you donāt hear a response, please do follow up in a bit.
Thanks for this Bhante. For some reason I had a really old version of that tool bookmarked.
I was going to start a new thread for this, but it seemed to fit here tooā¦ Iām wondering if the search tool can do PTS Verse Numbers yet? I canāt find it. So this would be vnp numbers, for example Verse 290 of SuttanipÄta is here (i.e. SuttaCentral numbering Snp2.7:8.1)
There is an undocumented filter ref:
that might work. Could you see if you could get what you want with that?
Cool. Thank you so much Bhante. This looks like it should work perfectly! Iāll give it a proper go tomorrow.
Edit: Yes. This worked great today!! Thank-you once again Bhante.
Thanks again HongDa. Iāve been using volpage and ref fairly intensively over the past few days, and it really is working very well for me indeed. It makes these little projects of mine so much more doable
Thanks for the feedback!
@HongDa, do you think we could go ahead and publish this filter? so far itās undocumented.
Yes, Bhante, it seems to be working fine so far, Iāll add it to the filter description page.
Just to let you know I get unexpected (undefined) results from this - something to do with different editions Iām guessing. Having said that, I still got the actual result I was after:
Always wanting a little bit moreādoes my greed know no bounds!..
If I do this search
ref: vnp705
then I get this:
So thatās greatāI know I am looking for something in Snp. But in addition to the pts-vp-pli numbers it would be really cool if I could have vnp numbers too, so I could go straight to the (english) translation of the verse. In this case it there would be a vnp705 and it would take me here
Hi again @HongDa and @Snowbird
Iām on dodgy ground here, because I donāt really know this collection or itās structure, but I think it might be another data problem. I was expecting verse numbers in the CariyÄpiį¹aka, but there donāt seem to be any. So, for example a search for ref: vnp 371
(or maybe 370
) would point me towards an entry for: Cp 35:16.1
I have no idea. Iām also very unfamiliar with that collection. I donāt really understand what you are asking for. If there are no verse numbers, then vnp
canāt point you to anything, can it?
Ah yes. Itās becoming a bit clearer to me. So there are no verse numbers (or appear to be no verse numbers) in SuttaCentral, but if I look at the Wikipedia page for the CariyÄpiį¹aka we find:
text contains 35 such stories, spanning 356[8] to 371 verses.[9]
In note 8 we find:
356 verses are enumerated in the Chaį¹į¹ha Saį¹ gÄyana (CSCD) edition of the Pali Canon.
Note 9 says:
371 verses are enumerated in the Sri Lanka Tripitaka Project (SLTP) edition of the Pali Canon.
The text that Iām working on at the moment seems to be referring to verse numbers in the SLTP edition. Iām now wondering if either or both of these should be included in SC?
So my use of the term ādata problemā was wrong and misleading. Sorry.
Oh, no problem at all. Iām just so unfamiliar with that text that I have no basis for understanding.
Bhante @Sujato, do you want these verse numbers added to Bilara? @stu, are you volunteering to add them?
Maybe, Stu, if we donāt hear from Bhante you could write up an issue on suttacentral/bilara-data
so this doesnāt get forgotten. Include as much research as you have found that could be helpful.
Itās not something Iāve got bandwidth for at the moment, but Iāll circle back around to this later this year hopefully Bhante.