There is, monks, an unborn–unbecome–unmade–unfabricated. If there were not that unborn–unbecome–unmade–unfabricated, there would not be the case that escape from the born–become–made–fabricated would be discerned. But precisely because there is an unborn–unbecome–unmade–unfabricated, escape from the born–become–made–fabricated is discerned.
Trans. Ven. Thanissaro
Now, we know the problem that “if nibbana is unproduced, how does the eightfold path lead to nibbana?”. One answer would be to say that the eightfold path does not produce nibbana, but does produce the realization of nibbana.
That’s what Bodhi seems to be saying :
Is Nibbana conditioned by its path?
Now the question is often asked: If Nibbana is attained by the practice of the path, doesn’t this make it something conditioned something produced by the path? Doesn’t Nibbana become an effect of the cause, which is the path? Here we have to distinguish between Nibbana itself and the attainment of Nibbana. By practising the path one doesn’t bring Nibbana into existence but rather discovers something already existing, something always
present.
Ven. Bodhi
This means that the realization of nibbana is produced, while nibbana is unproduced.
Now, this poses a problem, because if the realization of nibbana is produced, it means that the arahant has not escaped all that is produced. And so there would be a contradiction. How can we solve this problem? Thanks in advance.
May all beings be happy