So, do we have to practice it ?
Does it help to attain liberation ?
Why it was introduced by the Buddha ?
We donāt have to. But it helps with the 5 hindrances- especially anger. It is the underlying basis of the precepts and generosity, without which there would be no stream entry. So it depends how nice a person you are to begin with. On its own it doesnāt lead to liberation as it is a samatha (tranquillity) practice, but it can be combined with vipassana practices.
Yes. But not on its own. There is a sutta where the Buddha in a previous birth had practiced it for many years and became maha brahma etc, but wasnāt liberated.
Because it is helpful, wholesome (kusala) and beneficial for the many, even if they do not attain enlightenment purely from it.
with metta
Another question if
you donāt mind , there
is in the suttas mentioned
that if a person attained
Liberation , they will achieved
the 4 immeasurable
at the same time ? Or not ?
Thank you in advance .
I havenāt come across this. They wonāt necessarily achieve the pinnacle of the four immeasurables as that will be immaterial jhana - not all arahanths have immaterial jhana. However arahanths will be very wholesome individuals and is likely to have many of the qualities of the four immeasurables to a great degre.
with metta
Are you saying that Metta, etc. practice leads to the four attainments (later on mistakenly called arupa-jhanas)?
When I did a Metta retreat with Banthe Sujato he indicated that Metta can lead into Jhanas (the Buddha Jhanas).
Can you clarify jhÄna and Buddha jhÄna ?
Brahama Vihara Sutta.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an10/an10.208.than.html
Mettam Sutta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn46/sn46.054x.wlsh.html
Hi mat ,
I just read SA743 and SN 46.54 ,
Only the last 3, which is ,
compassion , joy , equanimity
leads to 3 arupa jhÄna.
Not including neither perception
Nor non perception .
Loving kindness leads to
one of the 4 classes of
rÅ«pa jhÄna .
(subdivided to 16)
Metta .
I like to call the four Jhanas found in the eightfold path and the various descriptions of the Buddha awakening night, the Buddha Jhanas.
I ignore the others in particular the so called arupa-jhanas (late terminology) which are usually called the four attainments.
There are couple of sutta-s in the Bojjhanga Samyutta which line-up the Brahma-vihara-s with the arupa-ayatana-s (s/t called jhana-s 5-8).
Only the last 3, which is ,
compassion , joy , equanimity
leads to 3 arupa jhÄna.
Not including neither perception
Nor non perception .
Loving kindness leads to
4th rÅ«pa jhÄna .
In SN 46.54 it says loving kindness leads to āthe deliverance of the beautifulā. Is that what you are taking to mean the 4th jhÄna? If so, is that generally accepted? Do we have any references about that to confirm that?
What does SA say these lead to? Same? Or a different term for this one?
Also I find this passage strange:
āMay I dwell perceiving the repulsive in the unrepulsive,ā he dwells perceiving the repulsive therein. If he wishes: āMay I dwell perceiving the unrepulsive in the repulsive,ā he dwells perceiving the unrepulsive therein.
If something is by definition unrepulsive, then how do you preceive the repulsive in it? Is this by using the imagination to perceive something which is in fact not there, not real? And what has this got to do with loving kindness?
The Brahmaviharas can lead to rebirth in the brahma world or all the way to full enlightenment depending on the mode of practice (by themselves or combined with the enlightenment factors). From Ven. Bodhiās note citing the Cmy. to SN 46.54:
This conjunction of the enlightenment factors with the four divine abodes is unusual. On their own momentum the divine abodes lead to rebirth in the brahma world rather than to Nibbana (see MN II 82,24-27, II 207-8, AN II 128-29). When integrated into the structure of the BuddhaĀs path, however, they can be used to generate concentration of sufficient strength to serve as a basis for insight, which in turn brings enlightenment. A striking instance is at MN I 351,18-352,2. Spk: The monk develops the three jhanas based on lovingkindness, then takes this as a basis for developing insight and attains arahantship. The enlightenment factors are developed by insight and the path.
Here, you can see 1 St line
ę is loving kindness
ę¼åęč, ā å ā refer to " pure " ļ¼
according to the monk whom
teaches in our class ,
Pure abode is rÅ«pa jhÄna .
Is there any evidence in the EBTs to back up that interpretation?
Only the last 3, which is ,
compassion , joy , equanimity
leads to 3 arupa jhÄna.
Not including neither perception
Nor non perception .
Loving kindness leads to
one of the 4 classes of
rÅ«pa jhÄna .
You are correct!
with metta
If we look at the term
brahma vihara ,
ie is brahma dwelling / abode .
Itās in the rupa realms , so,
the summit for one to attain
by doing Metta bhavana ,
would be SubhaparamÄhaį¹ ,
and this could not be crossing
over to the Arupa realms !
I do not see how your statement can be logically correct. Since:
That which has compassion has
the sphere of infinity of space
as its supreme goal. That which
is joy has the sphere of infinity of consciousness as supreme goal.
Are you saying that these formless attainments are in the form realm, not the formless realm?!
Does it help to attain liberation ?
You may also find some of the comments from the following thread from a while ago relevant to your reflection.
Dear Friends On this video ven. Punnaji affirms (min 23 ) that if you pratice the Brahamaviharas you can reach final liberation, does anyone have a reference in the Suttas for this? [2016 Dhamma Discussion Bhante V and Punnaji Part 2]
It was the part where you said:
If we look at the term
brahma vihara ,
ie is brahma dwelling / abode .
Itās in the rupa realms , so,
the summit for one to attain
by doing Metta bhavana ,
would be SubhaparamÄhaį¹ ,
and this could not be crossing over to the Arupa realms !
You seem to be saying the state achieved from mettÄ has to be in the form realm because it is a brahmavihÄra. But how can that logic work if the state achieved from the other brahmavihÄras are formless?
You do realise you are totally contradicting youself right? And that therefore the basis of logic for backing up your interpretation of loving kindness being 4th jhÄna is meaningless. Thatās not to say the conclusion is wrong (I donāt know either way) - but your reasoning is clearly wrong. You do see that, right?
You do see that, right?
Really sorry , you have to ask
someone else . I am not good
either in english or dhamma .
No worries