Anicca is not just impermanence, there are eight more to it

[Coemgenu]

@kstan1122

Have you read the sutta “SN 44.10 With Ānanda – Ānandasutta” that I have put it in a file in the post " Attā and anattā real meaning reveal in the sutta " that the Buddha did not answer questions from Vacchagotta on whether “does the self exist absolutely?” or “does the self not exist absolutely?”.

In that thread, you posted an absurd document that had this information on it:

@Coemgenu

atta [singular] with control, in-control, with essence, ultimate truth
anatta [singular] without control, not in-control, without essence
attā [plural] with controls, in-controls, with essences, ultimate truths

How do you account for this very serious mistake of basic Pāli grammar? No one with a competent grasp of Pāli would produce this. “Attā” is not a plural for “atta”. What possessed you to write that it was?