Obviously, quite a few are still missing. Anything south and west of the Ganges cluster isn‘t a problem, as the rivers aren‘t too close together there.
Speaking purely visually, from the heartland I‘d also include the Ghaghara, the Gomati, and possibly the Son. What do you think?
About the Himalayas, I‘d probably just not picture the river sources and have some nice mountains there instead.
East of the Ganges cluster, toward the edge, there‘s a tangle of rivers. Unless some of them are important, I‘d just leave them out of the map.
By the way, any new insights about the course changes?
The origin point is described rather as “in the domain of Assaka, close by Aḷaka, on the bank of the Godhavari”.
Now, Aḷaka is merely a variant reading for Mūlaka (also maḷaka, muḷaka, mūḷhaka). This is a dubious place name which appears to be mentioned nowhere else but here. The only other mention is later in the same passage, where they are said to first go to “Patiṭṭhāna of Aḷaka”. So this rightaway shows that Anandajoti’s separation of Patitthana and Alaka/Mulaka cannot be correct.
Luckily, we have an exact location for Patitthana, which is the modern Paithan.
According to Raychaudhuri as cited on Wikipedia, Alaka/Mulaka was incorporated in Assaka during this time, so it was probably politically speaking a province at the west of Assaka as indicated on the above map.
Now, the Godhavari is flowing from the north-west (modern Nashik) through to Paithan and thence to the capital of Assaka, which is identified as the modern Bodhan. Unfortunately you can’t highlight rivers on Google maps, but the road journey follows a similar trajectory.
If Bavari’s hermitage was to the west of Patitthana, there would be no reason for them to backtrack there at the start of their journey. It must have been downstream along the Godhavari, to the south east. Probably not far, as it remained within the Alaka province.
By the way, the word I have translated in saying that Bavari’s hermitage in Alaka is “close by” Assaka is also dubious. It is samāsana (or samāsanna), literally “sitting with”.
It’s only used twice elsewhere in the Pali, where it has two senses: a parrot who lived “close by” a hut, or a lowly jackal that cannot have “equal standing” with a tiger king. The commentary says it means that Bavari lived in a border region under the shared dominion of the kings of Alaka and Assaka. Perhaps it is just a coincidence, but the Pandyas, a prominent dynasty of southern India, were known to have practiced coregency at some times, which might lend support to the commentary.
I don‘t, but except for the Son, they‘re listed in Wikipedia‘s category Rivers in Buddhism.
But maybe we can attack this from a different angle, make a list of all the cities and other sites that should be featured on the map (again, the fewer places there are in dense areas, the more elegant I can make it look; compare the chaos of detailed Indian geography to the nice, clean Middle Earth map), see which ones are located next to a river, and include that river.
Well, yes. Do you think we can safely omit it for style and clarity? Unfortunately, I‘m not versed in the geography of Buddhist India, so I have to ask for instructions like that. And please forgive my insistence, it‘s just that I want to avoid errors that readers might falsely attribute to you and any other authors of the book.
What‘s the plan? Should we include everything as it is, or is there some research underway?
Here‘s a WIP barebones version with just the rivers you pointed out, capital cities and some change. It‘s missing proper lettering (will decide on size and placement only after everything‘s on the map), names of kingdoms and republics, nice mountains and forests, a title plaque, a simple ornamental frame (possibly featuring a smattering of Bodhi leaves if I‘m feeling frivolous), a scale indicator, and probably a lot of places. I‘ve been using a grid for flexibility; adding things afterwards with a traced sketch isn‘t quite so handy.
Could you make a list of rivers and places that are missing?
Do we want special icons for certain places? If so, what should they be?
The spelling and diacritics are taken from the SC map, but I couldn’t find everything, so please make corrections if necessary.
I‘d also be grateful if anyone had any pointers regarding the placement of mountains (aside from the Himalayas) and forests.
I don’t know if I could list the rivers, but I feel like there should be a couple of rivers coming from the north, past Mithila and Apana. I believe the major river that joins the Ganges near Apana was the Mahī. It’s not the river to the south that you have here, see this former post:
I’d suggest shrinking the scale a little, to make the outlines of the oceans a bit clearer.
Up to you. Maybe little drawings or flourishes would be better? Like some trees for a forest, or buildings for a city? But it depends on the scale.
They look good to me.
There are hills around Rajagaha, and these are important, as they’re mentioned often in the suttas. To the south also there is a rugged region known as the “southern hills”, modern Deccan. It’d be good to include these, as they show why the “southern road” went south-west rather than directly south.
As to forests, there are several that are named in the texts, like the “Dark Forest” outside of Savatthi. But I’m not sure if you have room for these. Otherwise, maybe just wait until the place names are there and put some tree in the empty places of the fertile regions, i.e. not in the deserts of the west.
You‘re right, even at this scale it could be hard to make any icons recognizable. I‘ll see if anything comes to mind.
Thank you, I‘ll be sure to include those! By the way, can or should we draw in some roads?
With the reduced number of rivers and places that‘s possible, but it will be a tradeoff since the further we zoom out, the more crowded it‘s gonna get around the Ganges, and the more white space we will have everywhere else. Not sure it‘s worth it.
Anyway, what do you think about the coast outline here, before I asked you to narrow down the region?
Should we put it down as a place, then? If so, could you mark your guess on a map?
The current sketch is also missing parts of the Parayanavagga journey I couldn‘t find on the buddhamap; I‘m assuming it would be OK to check the SC map and try to put them in the sketch as exactly as I can?
As far as I can make out, the Kosi joins the Kamla before they both join the Ganges. But no matter, I‘ll just put the whole lot in.
We can probably fill white space in some way that isn‘t too awkward, I‘m more concerned about the crowding. But if you think the coast outlines in the map segment I quoted in my last post are sufficient, I can whip up a sketch of that and we‘ll see.
As far as rivers go, I have a book that contains a lot of information and images about them both ancient and modern. It is a Springer book and I have it because of academic subscription access. If it is OK with you, I can send it via DM. Here are a couple of images.
Thank you very much! I can download it myself, my university has a Springer subscription as well. Bhante Sujato could probably use a copy, though.
Alright, here‘s a new zoomed out sketch showing coastline vs. crowding. As you can see, the Ganges area has very little space for appropriately-sized lettering, not to speak of any decorative mountains or forests. There‘s more coast, but I don‘t know if it‘s much of an improvement, the general outline of India still isn‘t that clear.
Apart from Patitthana, Mahissati, and Ujjeni, do we need to include a lot of places that aren‘t somewhere around the Ganges? Otherwise, I‘d say this is a bad tradeoff compared to the previous version.
That would be great! There should be enough space for it to fit in some corner, I‘ll do some experiments on how best to render that in black and white.
I‘ll go back to the previous sketch then, put the missing rivers in, and start with some of the ornaments. If there are no more things to add, I might have the entire pencil sketch done before visiting mum over Christmas, and we can let it digest a bit before committing to it with ink in the new year.
Alright, here‘s another WIP. I added some more of the major rivers so the space below the Ganges plains doesn‘t look so empty. I‘ve also found a map of mountain ranges: the slight markings all over the place denote the Aravalli Mountains, the Vindhya Mountains, the Satpura Mountains, the Deccan Plateau, the Chota Nagpur Plateau, and the Eastern Ghats, all of which I‘ll draw when the lettering‘s in place.
Would be fitting for a Buddhist book, I guess
It‘s also in the most crowded area of the map, I may have to shuffle things around a bit.
Regarding lettering: I‘ve decided to use all-capital serif letters, like the LOTR map (which at this point I‘m more or less copying), but I won‘t use Arno for copyright reasons, so the map can be freely distributed. Guess no one would be able to spot the difference with the handlettering, but just to be sure. Instead, there‘s an OpenFont licensed (i.e. free for personal and commercial use) version of the Garamond typeface, a French 16th century style which evolved from the humanist styles of the Italian Renaissance which Arno is based on.
Man, this is a bit more work than I had anticipated
Anyway, this is how far I‘ll get before the new year. Lettering‘s done save for two Mahajanapadas, most mountains and forests as well as the scale indicator and the India inlay are still missing, but you get the idea what it‘ll look like. Don‘t mind the eraser marks and guide lines, the final version will be digitally cleaned up.
Please go over the map to check for any more towns or regions you want put in, any spelling to be corrected, lettering to be redone or any style changes you may want. Now‘s the time! And don‘t be shy, I don‘t mind redoing stuff if it‘s not quite up to scratch.
I‘ll start doing the rest in 10 days or so.
We need to get the topography more accurate. The southern hills are not clumped together like that. In fact the opposite: those towns and regions are known because they are on the southern road that skirts the hills.
So you can see that from the main area around Rajagaha, the hills stretch south-west, so travellers would keep to their north. Then closer to the coast—around modern Surat or Mumbai, they would hook back east down to Andhra.
This map also makes it really clear why the population basis was in the Ganges plain!
Generally speaking, the forests would be associated with the hilly areas. So for the southern hills, and really the whole area outside of the Ganges plain, we could sprinkle some forests. This is especially the case for the Himalayas, whose approaches are always described in ecstatic terms as full of gorgeous forests. Less forest around the settled areas would then make sense, too.
See, I have this theory: if we really understood how hard anything was, we would never start.
