Māgadhabhāsā (Pāḷi) – A Compendious Grammar on the Language of Pāḷi Buddhism (Second Edition, Revised)

[sujato]

BTW, I just noticed the following:

International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration (IAST): ṃ

While IAST is normally understood to employ ṃ, the agreed convention was in fact ṁ.

It seems anusvāra was represented by ṁ not ṃ at the Geneva Congress of 1894

The Pali IAST transliteration system we use today was standardized at the Tenth International Congress of Orientalists in Geneva, 1894. In 2001, it was adapted with minor emendations to form ISO 15919. It is always said that one of the key differences between the two is the representation of anusvāra, which figures prominently in Pali as the nazalization at the end of words. IAST uses ṃ underdot for anusvāra, while ISO 15919 uses ṁ overdot. Thus are the battle lines drawn. Most Pali edit…

[Thanuttamo]

Thanks for the reference and notice, bhante!