Hello again. Inching my way through my patimokkha notes.
So, on bhikkhuni parajika 6:
Yā pana bhikkhunī jānaṁ pārājikaṁ dhammaṁ ajjhāpannaṁ bhikkhuniṁ
nevattanā paṭicodeyya, na gaṇassa āroceyya, yadā ca sā
ṭhitā vā assa cutā vā nāsitā vā avassaṭā vā, sā pacchā
evaṁ vadeyya “pubbevāhaṁ, ayye, aññāsiṁ etaṁ
bhikkhuniṁ ‘evarūpā ca evarūpā ca sā bhaginī’ti, no ca
kho attanā paṭicodessaṁ, na gaṇassa ārocessa”nti,
ayampi pārājikā hoti asaṁvāsā vajjappaṭicchādikā.
This is from the Mahāsaṅgīti version of the Dvemātikāpāḷi, also used here on SC. I am wondering if, egads, these are ‘typos’: paṭicodessaṁ and ārocessa”nti
PTS version has “paṭicodeyyaṁ” and “āroceyyaṁ” [Note: these particular variant readings are not included in the ‘variant readings’ pop-up menu in Sutta Central’s bhikkhuni vibhanga page for this rule. Should they be added?]
PTS’s version would seem to align better with the normal 1st person singular forms for the optative.
are ‘paṭicodessaṁ’ and ‘ārocessaṁ’ legitimate, albeit less common, alternatives for 1st person singular optative? Or is this just a textual error?
thanks again in advance, pali experts!